Recent advances in robotic surgery for rectal cancer
Authors:
- Soichiro IshiharaSISoichiro Ishihara
- Kensuke OtaniKOKensuke Otani
- Koji YasudaKYKoji Yasuda
- Takeshi NishikawaTNTakeshi Nishikawa
- Toshiaki TanakaTTToshiaki Tanaka
- Tomomichi KiyomatsuTKTomomichi Kiyomatsu
- Keisuke HataKHKeisuke Hata
- Kazushige KawaiKKKazushige Kawai
- Hiroaki NozawaHNHiroaki Nozawa
- Shinsuke KazamaSKShinsuke Kazama
- Hironori YamaguchiHYHironori Yamaguchi
- 10 June 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (4) , 633-640
Abstract
Robotic technology, which has recently been introduced to the field of surgery, is expected to be useful, particularly in treating rectal cancer where precise manipulation is necessary in the confined pelvic cavity. Robotic surgery overcomes the technical drawbacks inherent to laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer through the use of multi-articulated flexible tools, three-dimensional stable camera platforms, tremor filtering and motion scaling functions, and greater ergonomic and intuitive device manipulation. Assessments of the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for rectal cancer have reported similar operation times, blood loss during surgery, rates of postoperative morbidity, and circumferential resection margin involvement when compared with laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, rates of conversion to open surgery are reportedly lower with increased urinary and male sexual functions in the early postoperative period compared with laparoscopic surgery, demonstrating the technical advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. However, long-term outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for rectal cancer have not been fully evaluated yet; therefore, large-scale clinical studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of this new technology.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgeryTechniques in Coloproctology, 2015
- Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal CancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2015
- The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2013
- Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopySurgical Endoscopy, 2012
- A Comparative Study of Voiding and Sexual Function after Total Mesorectal Excision with Autonomic Nerve Preservation for Rectal Cancer: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic SurgeryAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2012
- Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomesSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Outcomes of Surgery Alone for Lower Rectal Cancer With and Without Pelvic Sidewall DissectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009
- Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative StudyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2009
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004