An Investigation of Associations Between Clinicians’ Ethnic or Racial Bias and Hypertension Treatment, Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control
Authors:
- 19 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 29 (7) , 987-995
Abstract
Few studies have directly investigated the association of clinicians’ implicit (unconscious) bias with health care disparities in clinical settings. To determine if clinicians’ implicit ethnic or racial bias is associated with processes and outcomes of treatment for hypertension among black and Latino patients, relative to white patients. Primary care clinicians completed Implicit Association Tests of ethnic and racial bias. Electronic medical records were queried for a stratified, random sample of the clinicians’ black, Latino and white patients to assess treatment intensification, adherence and control of hypertension. Multilevel random coefficient models assessed the associations between clinicians’ implicit biases and ethnic or racial differences in hypertension care and outcomes. Standard measures of treatment intensification and medication adherence were calculated from pharmacy refills. Hypertension control was assessed by the percentage of time that patients met blood pressure goals recorded during primary care visits. One hundred and thirty-eight primary care clinicians and 4,794 patients with hypertension participated. Black patients received equivalent treatment intensification, but had lower medication adherence and worse hypertension control than white patients; Latino patients received equivalent treatment intensification and had similar hypertension control, but lower medication adherence than white patients. Differences in treatment intensification, medication adherence and hypertension control were unrelated to clinician implicit bias for black patients (P = 0.85, P = 0.06 and P = 0.31, respectively) and for Latino patients (P = 0.55, P = 0.40 and P = 0.79, respectively). An increase in clinician bias from average to strong was associated with a relative change of less than 5 % in all outcomes for black and Latino patients. Implicit bias did not affect clinicians’ provision of care to their minority patients, nor did it affect the patients’ outcomes. The identification of health care contexts in which bias does not impact outcomes can assist both patients and clinicians in their efforts to build trust and partnership.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Unconscious Race and Social Class Bias With Vignette-Based Clinical Assessments by Medical StudentsJAMA, 2011
- Trends in Time to Confirmation and Recognition of New-Onset Hypertension, 2002–2006Hypertension, 2010
- Blood Pressure Trajectories and Associations With Treatment Intensification, Medication Adherence, and Outcomes Among Newly Diagnosed Coronary Artery Disease PatientsCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2010
- Aversive racism and medical interactions with Black patients: A field studyJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010
- Physicians’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes About Race by MD Race, Ethnicity, and GenderJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 2009
- Comparing Methods of Measuring Treatment Intensification in Hypertension CareCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2009
- Disparities and distrust: The implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health careSocial Science & Medicine, 2008
- Testing Electronic Algorithms to Create Disease Registries in a Safety Net SystemJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 2008
- Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White PatientsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- A General Method of Compliance Assessment Using Centralized Pharmacy RecordsMedical Care, 1988