An In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris and Instrumentation Times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex Instruments
- 1 October 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Endodontics
- Vol. 40 (10) , 1638-1641
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Study of Different Novel Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems for Root Canal Preparation in Severely Curved Root CanalsJournal of Endodontics, 2014
- Fatigue Testing of Controlled Memory Wire Nickel-Titanium Rotary InstrumentsJournal of Endodontics, 2011
- An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris using three rotary nickel-titanium instrumentsJournal of Dental Sciences, 2010
- Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniquesOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2008
- Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systemsOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2006
- Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine‐driven instrumentation techniquesInternational Endodontic Journal, 2005
- The Effect of Disruption of Apical Constriction on Periapical ExtrusionJournal of Endodontics, 2005
- Current Challenges and Concepts in the Preparation of Root Canal Systems: A ReviewJournal of Endodontics, 2004
- The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debrisJournal of Endodontics, 1987
- Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factorsJournal of Endodontics, 1985