Adherence to the CDK 4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib and Omission of Dose Management Supported by Pharmacometric Modelling as Part of the OpTAT Study
Authors:
- Carole BandieraCarole Bandiera
- Isabella LocatelliILIsabella Locatelli
- Perrine CourletPCPerrine Courlet
- Evelina CardosoECEvelina Cardoso
- Khalil ZamanKZKhalil Zaman
- Athina StravodimouASAthina Stravodimou
- Ana DolcanADAna Dolcan
- Apostolos SarivalasisASApostolos Sarivalasis
- Jean-Philippe ZurcherJZJean-Philippe Zurcher
- Veronica Aedo-LopezVAVeronica Aedo-Lopez
- Jennifer Dotta-CelioJDJennifer Dotta-Celio
- Solange PetersSPSolange Peters
Open Access
Abstract
The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib is administered orally and cyclically, causing medication adherence challenges. We evaluated components of adherence to palbociclib, its relationship with pharmacokinetics (PK), and drug-induced neutropenia. Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving palbociclib, delivered in electronic monitors (EM), were randomized 1:1 to an intervention and a control group. The intervention was a 12-month interprofessional medication adherence program (IMAP) along with monthly motivational interviews by a pharmacist. Implementation adherence was compared between groups using generalized estimating equation models, in which covariates were included. Model-based palbociclib PK and neutrophil profiles were simulated under real-life implementation scenarios: (1) optimal, (2) 2 doses omitted and caught up at cycle end. At 6 months, implementation was slightly higher and more stable in the intervention (n = 19) than in the control (n = 19) group, 99.2% and 97.3% (Δ1.95%, 95% CI 1.1–2.9%), respectively. The impact of the intervention was larger in patients diagnosed with MBC for >2 years (Δ3.6%, 95% CI 2.1–5.4%), patients who received >4 cycles before inclusion (Δ3.1%, 95% CI 1.7–4.8%) and patients >65 (Δ2.3%, 95% CI 0.8–3.6%). Simulations showed that 25% of patients had neutropenia grade ≥3 during the next cycle in scenario 1 versus 30% in scenario 2. Education and monitoring of patient CDK4/6i cycle management and adherence along with therapeutic drug monitoring can help clinicians improve prescription and decrease toxicity.Keywords
Funding Information
- Swiss Cancer Research Foundation (HSR-4077-11-2016)
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among breast cancer survivors in clinical practice: a systematic reviewBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012
- A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medicationsBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2012
- A Proposal for Quality Standards for Measuring Medication Adherence in ResearchAIDS and Behavior, 2012
- Practical and Analytic Issues in the Electronic Assessment of AdherenceWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 2011
- Poor adherence is the main reason for loss of CCyR and imatinib failure for chronic myeloid leukemia patients on long-term therapyBlood, 2011
- An interdisciplinary HIV-adherence program combining motivational interviewing and electronic antiretroviral drug monitoringAIDS Care, 2011
- Early discontinuation and non-adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy are associated with increased mortality in women with breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trialBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- Use of Electronic Monitoring Induces a 40-Day Intervention Effect in HIV PatientsJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2006