Growth of Belgian and Norwegian children compared to the WHO growth standards: prevalence below -2 and above +2 SD and the effect of breastfeeding
- 30 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 96 (10) , 916-921
Abstract
Background New national growth references have been published in Belgium and Norway. The WHO recommends universal use of their 2006 Child Growth Standards based on data from breastfed children. Objective To compare the growth of Belgian and Norwegian children with the WHO standards. Participants 6985 children 0–5 years of age from Belgium and Norway. Design Proportion of children below −2 SD and above +2 SD of the WHO standards was calculated for length/height, weight, body mass index and head circumference. Average SD scores of exclusively breastfed children of non-smoking mothers were compared with national reference data and with the WHO standards. Results Generally, the number of Belgian and Norwegian children below −2 SD lines of the WHO standards was lower and above +2 SD higher than expected. The largest differences were for head circumference (0.97% Belgian and 0.18% Norwegian children below −2 SD, 6.55% Belgian and 6.40% Norwegian children above +2 SD) and the smallest for length/height (1.25% Belgian and 1.43% Norwegian children below −2 SD, 3.47% Belgian and 2.81% Norwegian children above +2 SD). The growth pattern of breastfed children of non-smoking mothers was in both countries more alike the local national growth references than the WHO standards. Conclusions There are significant deviations in the proportion of children outside normal limits (±2 SD) of the WHO standards. This was true for all children, including those who were exclusively breastfed. Hence, adoption of the WHO growth charts could have consequences for clinical decision-making. These findings advocate the use of national references in Belgium and Norway, also for breastfed children.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- References for growth and pubertal development from birth to 21 years in Flanders, BelgiumAnnals of Human Biology, 2009
- Growth charts for Norwegian childrenTidsskrift for Den norske legeforening, 2009
- Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studiesArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2008
- Are universal standards for optimal infant growth appropriate? Evidence from a Hong Kong Chinese birth cohortArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2008
- WHO Child Growth Standards in actionArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2008