Approaches to calculating AAPM TG-43 brachytherapy dosimetry parameters for Cs137, I125, Ir192, Pd103, and Yb169 sources
Authors:
- Christopher S. MelhusCMChristopher S. Melhus
- Mark J. RivardMRMark J. Rivard
- 18 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 33 (6Part1) , 1729-1737
Abstract
Underlying characteristics in brachytherapy dosimetry parameters for medical radionuclides 137Cs, 125I, 192Ir, 103Pd, and 169Yb were examined using Monte Carlo methods. Sources were modeled as unencapsulated point or line sources in liquid water to negate variations due to materials and construction. Importance of phantom size, mode of radiation transport physics--i.e., photon transport only or coupled photon:electron transport, phantom material, volume averaging, and Monte Carlo tally type were studied. For noninfinite media, g(r) was found to degrade as r approached R, the phantom radius. MCNP5 results were in agreement with those published using GEANT4. Brachytherapy dosimetry parameters calculated using coupled photon:electron radiation transport simulations did not differ significantly from those using photon transport only. Dose distributions from low-energy photon-emitting radionuclides 125I and 103Pd were sensitive to phantom material by upto a factor of 1.4 and 2.0, respectively, between tissue-equivalent materials and water at r =9 cm. In comparison, high-energy photons from 137Cs, 192Ir, and 169Yb demonstrated +/- 5% differences in dose distributions between water and tissue substitutes at r=20 cm. Similarly, volume-averaging effects were found to be more significant for low-energy radionuclides. When modeling line sources with L < or = 0.5 cm, the two-dimensional anisotropy function was largely within +/- 0.5% of unity for 137Cs, 125I, and 192Ir. However, an energy and geometry effect was noted for 103Pd and 169Yb, with Pd-103F(0.5,0 degrees)=l.05 and yb-169F(0.5,0 degrees)=0.98 for L=0.5 cm. Simulations of monoenergetic photons for L=0.5 cm produced energy-dependent variations in F(r, theta) having a maximum value at 10 keV, minimum at 50 keV, and approximately 1.0 for higher-energy photons up to 750 keV. Both the F6 cell heating and *F4 track-length estimators were employed to determine brachytherapy dosimetry parameters. F6 was found to be necessary for g(r), while both tallies provided equivalent results for F(r, theta).Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dosimetric evaluation of the Fletcher–Williamson ovoid for pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo studyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2005
- Parameter dependence of the MCNP electron transport in determining dose distributionsMedical Physics, 2002
- Comment on “Let's abandon geometry factors other than that of a point source in brachytherapy dosimetry” [Med Phys.29, 1917-1918 (2002)]Medical Physics, 2002
- Let's abandon geometry factors other than that of a point source in brachytherapy dosimetryMedical Physics, 2002
- Dosimetric characteristics of the DRAXIMAGE model LS-1 I-125 interstitial brachytherapy source design: A Monte Carlo investigationMedical Physics, 2002
- Variation in interpretation of the AAPM TG-43 geometry factor leads to unclearness in brachytherapy dosimetryMedical Physics, 2001
- Monte Carlo calculations of dose rate distributions around the Amersham CDCS-M-type 137Cs sourceMedical Physics, 2000
- Refinements to the geometry factor used in the AAPM Task Group Report No. 43 necessary for brachytherapy dosimetry calculationsMedical Physics, 1999
- Monte Carlo‐aided dosimetry of a new high dose‐rate brachytherapy sourceMedical Physics, 1998
- Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43Medical Physics, 1995