Prevalence, Severity, and Clinical Management of Brain Incidental Findings in Healthy Young Adults: MRi-Share Cross-Sectional Study
Open Access
- 20 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Neurology
- Vol. 12
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Young adults represent an increasingly large proportion of healthy volunteers in brain imaging research, but descriptions of incidental findings (IFs) in this age group are scarce. We aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of IFs on brain MRIs of healthy young research participants aged 18–35 years, and to describe the protocol implemented to handle them.Methods: The study population comprised 1,867 participants aged 22.1 ± 2.3 years (72% women) from MRi-Share, the cross-sectional brain MRI substudy of the i-Share student cohort. IFs were flagged during the MRI quality control. We estimated the proportion of participants with IFs [any, requiring medical referral, potentially serious (PSIFs) as defined in the UK biobank]: overall, by type and severity of the final diagnosis, as well as the number of IFs.Results: 78/1,867 participants had at least one IF [4.2%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.4–5.2%]. IFs requiring medical referral (n = 38) were observed in 36/1,867 participants (1.9%, 1.4–2.7%), and represented 47.5% of the 80 IFs initially flagged. Referred IFs were retrospectively classified as PSIFs in 25/1,867 participants (1.3%, 0.9–2.0%), accounting for 68.4% of anomalies referred (26/38). The most common final diagnosis was cysts or ventricular abnormalities in all participants (9/1,867; 0.5%, 0.2–0.9%) and in those with referred IFs (9/36; 25.0%, 13.6–41.3%), while it was multiple sclerosis or radiologically isolated syndrome in participants with PSIFs (5/19; 26.3%, 11.5–49.1%) who represented 0.1% (0.0–0.4%) and 0.2% (0.03–0.5%) of all participants, respectively. Final diagnoses were considered serious in 11/1,867 participants (0.6%, 0.3–1.1%). Among participants with referred IFs, 13.9% (5/36) required active intervention, while 50.0% (18/36) were put on clinical surveillance.Conclusions: In a large brain imaging study of young healthy adults participating in research we observed a non-negligible frequency of IFs. The etiological pattern differed from what has been described in older adults.Keywords
Funding Information
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-COHO-05, ANR No.-10-IDEX-03-02, ANR-10-LABX-57)
- European Research Council (640643)
- H2020 European Research Council (667375, 754517)
- EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiologically isolated syndrome: an uncommon finding at a university clinic in a high-prevalence region for multiple sclerosisBMJ Open, 2013
- Managing Incidental Findings: Lessons From NeuroimagingThe American Journal of Bioethics, 2013
- Radiologically isolated syndrome – incidental magnetic resonance imaging findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis, a systematic reviewMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 2012
- Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteriaAnnals of Neurology, 2011
- Incidental MRI lesions suggestive of multiple sclerosis in asymptomatic patients in Karachi, PakistanJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2010
- Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2009
- Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosisNeurology, 2009
- Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and RecommendationsJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008
- The Risks and Benefits of Searching for Incidental Findings in MRI Research ScansJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008
- Incidental Findings on Brain MRI in the General PopulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007