Study Design of the Nationwide Japanese Lead Extraction (J‐LEX) Registry: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Open Registry
Open Access
- 10 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Arrhythmia
- Vol. 36 (5) , 849-853
Abstract
Background: Transvenous lead extractions (TLEs) in Japan have grown to become the standard therapy since the approval of the laser extraction system in 2008. However, little is known about the current indications, methods, success rate, and acute complications in the real‐world setting.Methods: The Japanese Lead EXtraction (J‐LEX) registry is a nationwide, multicenter, observational registry, performed by the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS) in collaboration with the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center. This study is a nationwide registry ordered by the JHRS and its data are collected prospectively using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system. The acute success rate at discharge and complications associated with TLEs will be collected in all cases. Based on the provided information, the annual incidence and predictive factors for the outcomes will be investigated by the Event Assessment Committee (EAC). This registry started in July 2018 and the number of participating medical institutions will be more than 50 hospitals and the target number of procedures will be 500‐1000 per year. We will also compare the results with other registries in foreign countries.Result: The results of this study are currently under investigation.Conclusion: The J‐LEX registry will provide real‐world data regarding the results and complications of TLEs for the various types of indications, methods, and performing hospitals in Japan.Keywords
Funding Information
- Japanese Heart Rhythm Society
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transvenous excimer laser-assisted lead extraction of cardiac implantable electrical devices in the Japanese elderly populationJournal of Cardiology, 2020
- Prognosis after lead extraction in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices infection: Comparison of lead‐related infective endocarditis with pocket infection in a Japanese single‐center experienceJournal of Arrhythmia, 2019
- Single-center experience with percutaneous lead extraction of cardiac implantable electric devicesJournal of Cardiology, 2018
- Trends in Use and Adverse Outcomes Associated with Transvenous Lead Removal in the United StatesCirculation, 2015
- Lead extraction using a laser system: Techniques, efficacy, and limitationsJournal of Arrhythmia, 2015
- Multicenter experience with extraction of the Riata/Riata ST ICD leadHeart Rhythm, 2014
- 16-Year Trends in the Infection Burden for Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the United StatesJACC, 2011
- Infection after pacemaker implantation: infection rates and risk factors associated with infection in a population-based cohort study of 46299 consecutive patientsEuropean Heart Journal, 2011
- Permanent Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator InfectionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2007
- Increasing rates of cardiac device infections among medicare beneficiaries: 1990–1999American Heart Journal, 2004