Maximizing Nutrition Support Practice and Measuring Adherence to Nutrition Support Guidelines in a Canadian Tertiary Care ICU
- 28 December 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 33 (3) , 209-217
Abstract
Objective: New comprehensive guidelines for nutrition support (NS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) can be used to improve quality of care and benchmark current practice. The objective of this study was to (a) compare NS practices in our medical/surgical ICU (MSICU) to 18 recommendations described in the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Society of Critical Care Medicine/American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guidelines, (b) determine the percentage of goal calories and protein delivered, and (c) identify the barriers to successful NS delivery. Design: This was a prospective observation trial of up to 14 days duration. Setting: A 24-bed MSICU in a tertiary teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada. Patients: We studied 98 mechanically ventilated patients with any diagnosis who were expected to require either enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN) for >48 hours. Measurements: We measured nutritional intake, barriers to nutritional intake, and parameters that allowed comparison of our practice to 18 guidelines. Main Results: Mean delivery of protein and energy was 79.3% and 81.1% of goal, respectively. The average time to initiation of EN support was 29.5 ± 23.7 hours. The 3 main reasons for interruption to enteral feeding were airway management issues, procedures, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Enteral feeding during vasopressor therapy was well tolerated. Ten of the 18 guidelines were followed for ≥80% of the time. Protein goals for patients on renal replacement therapy and patients with liver disease were not reached. Head-of-bed positioning was also inadequate. The 13 patients requiring PN all had appropriate indications for this therapy, including gastrointestinal leaks, maldigestion, or malabsorption. Conclusions: Nutrition support delivery was successful for most patients in this study. However, only 10 of the 18 guidelines were adequately followed. This study helped identify NS practices that work well and others that require strategies for improvement.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tolerability and Safety of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Intravenous Vasopressor TherapyJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2012
- Enteral Omega-3 Fatty Acid, γ-Linolenic Acid, and Antioxidant Supplementation in Acute Lung InjuryJAMA, 2011
- A phase II randomized placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of acute lung injury*Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Understanding Adherence to Guidelines in the Intensive Care UnitJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2010
- Early Enteral Nutrition and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients Treated With Vasopressors and Mechanical VentilationAmerican Journal of Critical Care, 2010
- Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patientsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2003
- Enteral nutrition practice in a surgical intensive care unit: what proportion of energy expenditure is delivered enterally?Clinical Nutrition, 2003
- A prospective survey of nutritional support practices in intensive care unit patients: What is prescribed? What is delivered?Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patientCritical Care Medicine, 1995