Psychometric evaluation of a Canadian version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-CAN)
Authors:
- for the APPROACH InvestigatorsFIfor the APPROACH Investigators
- Oluwaseyi A. LawalOLOluwaseyi A. Lawal
Open Access
- 1 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Background: The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a widely-used patient-reported outcomes measure in patients with heart disease. This study assesses the validity and reliability of the SAQ in a Canadian cohort of individuals with stable angina. Methods and results: Data are from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry, a population-based registry of patients who received cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada. The cohort consists of 4052 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for stable angina and completed the SAQ within 2 weeks. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the factorial structure of the SAQ. Internal and test–retest reliabilities of a new measure (i.e., SAQ-CAN) was measured using Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. CFA model fit was assessed using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI). Construct validity of the SAQ-CAN was assessed in relation to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Euro Quality of life 5 dimension (EQ5D), and original SAQ. Of the 4052 patients included in this analysis, 3281 (80.97%) were younger than 75 years old, while 3239 (79.94%) were male. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factorial structure consisting of 16 items that provided a better fit to the data (RMSEA = 0.049 [90% CI = (0.047, 0.052)]; CFI = 0.975). The 16-item SAQ demonstrated good to excellent internal reliability (Cronbach’s α range from 0.77 to 0.90), moderate to strong correlation with the Original SAQ and EQ5D but negligible correlations with HADS. Conclusion: The SAQ-CAN has acceptable psychometric properties that are comparable to the original SAQ. We recommend its use for assessing coronary health outcomes in Canadian patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Keywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (400774)
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, and University of Calgary Faculty Seed Grant
- Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta Doctoral Scholarship
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular Health: The Importance of Measuring Patient-Reported Health StatusCirculation, 2013
- Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with multiple sclerosis patientsMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 2009
- Prevalence and Predictors of Angina Pectoris One Month After Myocardial InfarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular DiseaseCirculation, 2005
- The UK version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-UK)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol GroupAnnals of Medicine, 2001
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery diseaseJACC, 1995
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983