Establishment of gestational diabetes risk prediction model and clinical verification
Authors:
Open Access
- 12 December 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
- Vol. 47 (5) , 1281-1287
Abstract
Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and build and validate an early risk prediction model of GDM by comparing the differences in the indicators of the first trimester of pregnancy between pregnant women with GDM and non-gestational diabetes mellitus (NGDM). Thus, this study provided a theoretical basis for early intervention of GDM. Methods: A total of 6000 pregnant women who underwent a routine prenatal examination in Qinhuangdao Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Qinhuangdao City, Hebei Province, China) from January 2016–2022 were retrospectively selected and randomly divided into a modeling cohort (4200 cases) and validation cohort (1800 cases) at a ratio of 3:7. According to the results of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), they were divided into NGDM and GDM groups. The modeling cohort consisted of 2975 NGDM and 1225 GDM cases, while the validation cohort consisted of 1281 NGDM and 519 GDM cases. The differences in general conditions and laboratory indicators between different groups were compared, and logistic regression analysis was further used to establish a risk prediction model for GDM in the first trimester. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and Hosmer–Lemeshow (HL) tests were used to evaluate the prediction of the model efficacy. Results: Age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood uric acid (UA), triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the first trimester were independent risk factors for GDM (P < 0.05). The model equation was Y = 1/{1 + exp[− (− 18.373 + age × 0.065 + BMI × 0.030 + first-trimester HbA1c × 2.519 + UA × 0.014 + TG × 0.224-HDL-C × 0.635)]}. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the model cohort was 0.803 (0.788–0.817), the sensitivity was 72.0%, and the specificity was 73.5%. The AUC of the validation cohort was 0.782 (0.759–0.806), the sensitivity was 68.6%, and the specificity was 73.8%. The P values of the HL test in both the training and validation sets were > 0.05, indicating a satisfactory model fit. Conclusion: Age, pre-pregnancy BMI, HbA1C in early pregnancy, blood UA, TG, and HDL-C are independent risk factors for GDM. The risk prediction model established by combining age, pre-pregnancy BMI, and laboratory indicators in the first trimester can provide a theoretical basis for early screening, monitoring, and intervention of GDM high-risk pregnant women.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening With Glycated Hemoglobin: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2020
- Maternal age and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 120 million participantsDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2020
- A Novel Early Pregnancy Risk Prediction Model for Gestational Diabetes MellitusFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 2018
- Maternal lipids, BMI and IL‑17/IL‑35 imbalance in concurrent gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsiaExperimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2018
- First trimester prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus: A clinical model based on maternal demographic parametersDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2017
- Epidemiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, predictors and prognosisHypertension Research, 2016
- Association of first trimester serum uric acid levels gestational diabetes mellitus developmentJournal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 2016
- First trimester prediction of maternal glycemic statusJournal of Perinatal Medicine, 2014
- Gestational diabetes: Development of an early risk prediction tool to facilitate opportunities for preventionAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2011
- International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in PregnancyDiabetes Care, 2010