Do no harm - re-evaluating the risks of overtreatment in community-wide tuberculosis screening
Preprint
Abstract
Background: Community-wide screening is a crucial strategy to end tuberculosis (TB), but a common concern is potential harm from overtreatment following false positive diagnoses. However, current reference standards determining test performance have limitations, with implications for prevalence thresholds and treatment decisions for community-wide screening. Methods: We estimated coverage of community-wide screening at a prevalence threshold of 0.5% (current global standard), 0.25%, and 0.1% for adult pulmonary TB. We considered test performance for Xpert Ultra against different reference standards (sputum culture, plus clinical evaluation, plus disease progression within two years). Potential harm was estimated through disability adjusted life years (DALYs) incurred or averted by treatment. We report net specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), the ratio of false positives to true positives, and DALYs averted for (non-)treatment based on different reference standards. Results: A lower threshold would increase screening coverage from the current 42% to 84% (0.25% threshold) and 89% (0.1% threshold) of the global TB burden. In a population of 100,000 with 0.5% prevalence, specificity was 99.5% for community screening, but increased to 99.7% using disease progression as reference standard, with PPV increasing from 45 to 66%. In addition, estimated harm of withholding appropriate treatment was approximately 1,200 times higher compared to providing inappropriate treatment, with treatment initiation after a positive Xpert Ultra increasing overall DALYs averted (median 5,977 versus 3,750). Discussion: The benefit of TB treatment following a positive molecular test in community-wide screening likely outweighs the harm associated with possible overtreatment, supporting expanding coverage of simplified community-wide screening. Brief summary: A concern with community-wide tuberculosis screening is the potential for overtreatment. We evaluated diagnostic reference standards and relative health costs of (non-)treatment, finding that after a positive molecular test, the benefit of initiating tuberculosis treatment likely outweighs its harm.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Authors’ Response to “TB Prevalence in People Tested is a Strong Predictor of Xpert Specificity in Community and Risk Group Screening”The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2025
- Tuberculosis Prevalence in People Tested Is a Strong Predictor of Xpert Specificity in Community and Risk Group ScreeningThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2025
- The health impact of identifying a person with tuberculosis through systematic screeningThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2025
- Scaling-up symptom-agnostic, community-wide screening toward global tuberculosis elimination: opportunities, challenges, and lessons from historyInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2025
- Lifetime burden of disease due to incident tuberculosis: a global reappraisal including post-tuberculosis sequelaeThe Lancet Global Health, 2021
- The Health and Economic Benefits of Tests That Predict Future Progression to Tuberculosis DiseaseEpidemiology, 2021
- The Spectrum of Tuberculosis Disease in an Urban Ugandan Community and Its Health FacilitiesClinical Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Community-wide Screening for Tuberculosis in a High-Prevalence SettingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2019
- Reassessment of the positive predictive value and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF: a diagnostic accuracy study in the context of community-wide screening for tuberculosisThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2016
- Disability weights for the Global Burden of Disease 2013 studyThe Lancet Global Health, 2015