Perinatal outcomes related to induction of labor: a call for randomized trials
Author:
- Aaron B. CaugheyACAaron B. Caughey
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 209 (3) , 168-169
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gestational age–specific severe maternal morbidity associated with labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013
- Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012
- Preventing the First Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based studyBMJ, 2012
- Elective Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women With an Unfavorable CervixObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Term Labor Induction Compared With Expectant ManagementObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Systematic Review: Elective Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management of PregnancyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2009
- The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational ageAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006