Nutritional Characterization of Chilean Landraces of Common Bean
Authors:
- Katherine MárquezKMKatherine Márquez
- Osvin ArriagadaOAOsvin Arriagada
- Ricardo Pérez-DíazRPRicardo Pérez-Díaz
- Ricardo A. CabezaRicardo A. Cabeza
- Andrea PlazaAPAndrea Plaza
- Bárbara ArévaloBABárbara Arévalo
- Lee A. MeiselLee A. Meisel
- Daniela OjedaDODaniela Ojeda
- Herman SilvaHSHerman Silva
- Andrés R. SchwemberASAndrés R. Schwember
- Camila FuentesCFCamila Fuentes
- Mónica FloresMFMónica Flores
Open Access
Abstract
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the primary grain legume cultivated worldwide for direct human consumption due to the high nutritional value of its seeds and pods. The high protein content of common beans highlights it as the most promising source of plant-based protein for the food industry. Additionally, landraces of common bean have great variability in nutritional traits, which is necessary to increase the nutritional quality of elite varieties. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to nutritionally characterize 23 Chilean landraces and 5 commercial varieties of common bean to identify genotypes with high nutritional value that are promising for the food industry and for genetic improvement programs. The landrace Phv23 (‘Palo’) was the most outstanding with high concentrations of minerals such as P (7.53 g/kg), K (19.8 g/kg), Mg (2.43 g/kg), Zn (52.67 mg/kg), and Cu (13.67 mg/kg); essential amino acids (364.8 mg/g protein); and total proteins (30.35 g/100 g seed). Additionally, the landraces Phv9 (‘Cimarrón’), Phv17 (‘Juanita’), Phv3 (‘Araucano’), Phv8 (‘Cabrita/Señorita’), and Phv4 (‘Arroz’) had a high protein content. The landrace Phv24 (‘Peumo’) stood out for its phenolic compounds (TPC = 218.1 mg GA/100 g seed) and antioxidant activity (ORAC = 22,167.9 μmol eq trolox/100 g extract), but it has moderate to low mineral and protein concentrations. In general, the concentration of nutritional compounds in some Chilean landraces was significantly different from the commercial varieties, highlighting their high nutritional value and their potential use for the food industry and for genetic improvement purposes.Keywords
Funding Information
- Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (R20F0001, 1201050, EQM200239)
- Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (R20F0001, 1201050, EQM200239)
- Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (R20F0001, 1201050, EQM200239)
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- A review of breeding objectives, genomic resources, and marker-assisted methods in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Molecular Breeding, 2019
- Determination of the protein quality of cooked Canadian pulsesFood Science & Nutrition, 2017
- A comprehensive meta‐analysis on dietary flavonoid and lignan intake and cancer risk: Level of evidence and limitationsMolecular Nutrition & Food Research, 2016
- The Diversity of Four Anti-nutritional Factors in Common BeanHorticultural Plant Journal, 2016
- Characterization and Comparison of Protein and Peptide Profiles and their Biological Activities of Improved Common Bean Cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mexico and BrazilPlant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2015
- Kinetic and compositional study of phenolic extraction from olive leaves (var. Serrana) by using power ultrasoundInnovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2013
- ggplot2WIREs Computational Statistics, 2011
- Zinc bioavailability in different beans as affected by cultivar type and cooking conditionsFood Research International, 2010
- Legumes as a source of natural antioxidantsEuropean Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 2008
- Microsatellite characterization of Andean races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2007