The Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register: Review of Clinical and Research Potential
Authors:
- Maria Hee Jung Park FrausingMFMaria Hee Jung Park Frausing
- Morten SchmidtMSMorten Schmidt
- Frederik MikkelsenFMFrederik Mikkelsen
- Jacob Moesgaard LarsenJLJacob Moesgaard Larsen
- Berit Thornvig PhilbertBPBerit Thornvig Philbert
- Helle Skovmand BosselmannHBHelle Skovmand Bosselmann
- Mayooran GnanaganeshMGMayooran Gnanaganesh
- Andi Eie AlbertsenAAAndi Eie Albertsen
Open Access
- 1 April 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. ume 18, 1-13
Abstract
The Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register (DPIR) was established in 1982 as a hardware registry and clinical quality database dedicated to cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. It is among the most comprehensive and longest-running CIED registries in the world and has recorded over 200,000 CIED procedures in more than 133,000 individuals. Leveraging the Danish registry infrastructure, individual-level linkage to other national clinical and administrative registries via the unique personal identification number greatly expands its research potential. This review summarizes the development, database structure, variable content and quality, and the clinical and scientific impact of DPIR. Examples of data quality include complete national coverage of all CIED procedures, standardized data-entry fields that minimize variability across centers, mandatory reporting of core variables, and high concordance between registry entries and source documentation. Data from DPIR has informed clinical practice guidelines and supported clinical quality improvement in Denmark and internationally. The graphical abstract is divided into two sections. The left highlights features of a complete national cohort: nationwide coverage, detailed patient, device, and procedural data, linkage to national databases and registries, and high variable completeness and accuracy. The right focuses on clinical aspects: clinical follow-up, safety monitoring, quality assurance (hand icon), and epidemiological research.Graphical abstract highlighting key strengths and characteristics of the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does targeted positioning of the left ventricular pacing lead towards the latest local electrical activation in cardiac resynchronization therapy reduce the incidence of death or hospitalization for heart failure?American Heart Journal, 2023
- Long-term follow-up of selective and non-selective His bundle pacing leads in patients with atrioventricular blockJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023
- Cardiac surgery in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and risk of device infections: a nationwide nested case–control studyJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2022
- Complications with left bundle branch area pacingHeart Rhythm, 2022
- Rate of permanent cardiac implantable electronic device infections after active fixation temporary transvenous pacing: A nationwide Danish cohort studyHeart Rhythm O2, 2021
- Single-coil and dual-coil defibrillator leads and association with clinical outcomes in a complete Danish nationwide ICD cohortHeart Rhythm, 2016
- Prospective nationwide fluoroscopic and electrical longitudinal follow-up of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in DenmarkHeart Rhythm, 2014
- The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiologyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2014
- Nationwide Fluoroscopic Screening of Recalled Riata Defibrillator Leads in DenmarkHeart Rhythm, 2013
- Risk factors for lead complications in cardiac pacing: A population-based cohort study of 28,860 Danish patientsHeart Rhythm, 2011