Variability in conditioned pain modulation predicts response to NSAID treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis
Open Access
- 13 July 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
Patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA) demonstrate hyperalgesia and altered pain-modulatory responses. While some prior work has demonstrated cross-sectional associations between laboratory and clinical pain measures, it is unknown whether individual variability in quantitative sensory testing (QST) responses at baseline can prospectively predict analgesic treatment responses. Patients with knee OA (n = 35) were compared on QST responses to a demographically-matched pain-free control group (n = 39), after which patients completed a month-long treatment study of diclofenac sodium topical gel (1 %), applied up to 4 times daily. OA patients demonstrated reduced pain thresholds at multiple anatomic sites, as well as reduced conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and enhanced temporal summation of pain. The most pain-sensitive patients tended to report the most intense and neuropathic OA pain. Following diclofenac treatment, the knee OA cohort showed a roughly 30 % improvement in pain, regardless of the presence or absence of neuropathic symptoms. Baseline CPM scores, an index of endogenous pain-inhibitory capacity, were prospectively associated with treatment-related changes in clinical pain. Specifically, participants with higher CPM at baseline (i.e., better functioning endogenous pain-inhibitory systems) showed more reduction in pain at the end of treatment (p < .05). These results support prior findings of amplified pain sensitivity and reduced pain-inhibition in OA patients. Moreover, the moderate to strong associations between laboratory-based measures of pain sensitivity and indices of clinical pain highlight the clinical relevance of QST in this sample. Finally, the prospective association between CPM and diclofenac response suggests that QST-based phenotyping may have utility in explaining inter-patient variability in long-term analgesic treatment outcomes. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT01383954 . Registered June 22, 2011.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (R01 AG034982)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR057920)
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical inquiry: does topical diclofenac relieve osteoarthritis pain?2015
- The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 studyAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2014
- Can Quantitative Sensory Testing Move Us Closer to Mechanism-Based Pain Management?Pain Medicine, 2014
- Personalized Pain Medicine: The Clinical Value of Psychophysical Assessment of Pain Modulation ProfileRambam Maimonides Medical Journal, 2013
- Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensusPain, 2013
- Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Predictor for Development and Treatment of Neuropathic PainCurrent Pain and Headache Reports, 2013
- How to define responders in osteoarthritisCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2013
- Predicting Response to Pregabalin from Pretreatment Pain Quality: Clinical Applications of the Pain Quality Assessment ScalePain Medicine, 2013
- Normalization of widespread hyperesthesia and facilitated spatial summation of deep‐tissue pain in knee osteoarthritis patients after knee replacementArthritis & Rheumatism, 2012
- The Reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the Assessment of Patients With Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpine, 2002