On the Workings of a Cartel: Evidence from the Norwegian Cement Industry
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 96 (1) , 321-338
Abstract
Using data on prices, production, and exports, we are able to identify marginal costs as well as the effectiveness of the Norwegian cement industry cartel. We find that our marginal cost estimates are very much in line with the detailed cost accounting data. We show that the cement cartel has been ineffective because the sharing rule induces “overproduction” and exporting below marginal costs. It is consumers — not firms — who benefit from the sharing rule. The ineffectiveness of the cartel was becoming so large that domestic welfare of a merger to monopoly would be positive around 1968, which is when the merger actually took place! We also show that competition would have resulted in even higher welfare gains over the entire sample.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rules, Communication, and Collusion: Narrative Evidence from the Sugar Institute CaseAmerican Economic Review, 2001
- Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry, 1890-1914The RAND Journal of Economics, 1998
- Looking at the Cost Side of “Monopoly”The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1997
- Cartel Unity over the Business CycleCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1997
- Price Wars and the Stability of Collusion: A Study of the Pre‐World War I Bromine IndustryThe Journal of Industrial Economics, 1997
- Antitrust, Marketing Cooperatives, and Market PowerEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 1997
- Excess Capacity and CollusionInternational Economic Review, 1990
- Consumer-benefited cartels under strategic capital investment competitionInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 1989
- Dynamic Duopoly: Prices and QuantitiesReview of Economic Studies, 1987
- Noncooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price InformationEconometrica, 1984