Personal protective equipment and improving compliance among healthcare workers in high-risk settings
Authors:
- 1 August 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 29 (4) , 400-406
Abstract
Purpose of review: Personal protective equipment (PPE) protects healthcare workers (HCWs) from infection by highly virulent pathogens via exposure to body fluids and respiratory droplets. Given the recent outbreaks of contagious infectious diseases worldwide, including Ebola virus and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome, there is urgent need for further research to determine optimal PPE use in high-risk settings. This review intends to provide a general understanding of PPE and to provide guidelines for appropriate use based on current evidence. Recent findings: Although previous studies have focused on the efficacy of PPE in preventing transmission of pathogens, recent studies have examined the dangers to HCWs during removal of PPE when risk of contamination is highest. Access to adequate PPE supplies is crucial to preventing transmission of pathogens, especially in resource-limited settings. Adherence to appropriate PPE use is a challenge due to inadequate education on its usage, technical difficulties, and tolerability of PPE in the workplace. Future projects aim at ameliorating this situation, including redesigning PPE which is crucial to improving the safety of HCWs. Summary: PPE remains the most important strategy for protecting HCW from potentially fatal pathogens. Further research into optimal PPE design and use to improve the safety of HCWs is urgently needed.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lessons LearnedCritical Care Medicine, 2015
- Personal Protective Equipment for Filovirus Epidemics: A Call for Better EvidenceThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2015
- Ebola Virus Disease and the Need for New Personal Protective EquipmentJAMA, 2014
- Protecting Health Care Workers From Ebola: Personal Protective Equipment Is Critical but Is Not EnoughAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2014
- Debate on MERS-CoV respiratory precautions: surgical mask or N95 respirators?Singapore Medical Journal, 2014
- Coronavirus Survival on Healthcare Personal Protective EquipmentInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2010
- Surgical Masks for Protection of Health Care Personnel against Pandemic Novel Swine‐Origin Influenza A (H1N1)–2009: Results from an Observational StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Surgical Mask vs N95 Respirator for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care WorkersJAMA, 2009
- A Study of the Value of Simple Protective Isolation in Patients with GranulocytopeniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Possible Transmission by Fomites of Respiratory Syncytial VirusThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1980