Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study
Open Access
- 4 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 34 (2) , 138-146
Abstract
To determine the prevalence, predictors of newly acquired, and the prognostic value of right bundle branch block (RBBB) and incomplete RBBB (IRBBB) on a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram in men and women from the general population. We followed 18 441 participants included in the Copenhagen City Heart Study examined in 1976–2003 free from previous myocardial infarction (MI), chronic heart failure, and left bundle branch block through registry linkage until 2009 for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The prevalence of RBBB/IRBBB was higher in men (1.4%/4.7% in men vs. 0.5%/2.3% in women, P < 0.001). Significant predictors of newly acquired RBBB were male gender, increasing age, high systolic blood pressure, and presence of IRBBB, whereas predictors of newly acquired IRBBB were male gender, increasing age, and low BMI. Right bundle branch block was associated with significantly increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in both genders with age-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11–1.54] and 1.87 (95% CI, 1.48–2.36) in the gender pooled analysis with little attenuation after multiple adjustment. Right bundle branch block was associated with increased risk of MI with an HR of 1.67 (95% CI, 1.16–2.42) and pacemaker insertion with an HR of 2.17 (95% CI, 1.22–3.86), but not with chronic heart failure (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.96–1.94), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73–1.67), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.60–1.62). The presence of IRBBB was not associated with any adverse outcome. In this cohort study, RBBB and IRBBB were two to three times more common among men than women. Right bundle branch block was associated with increased cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality, whereas IRBBB was not. Contrary to common perception, RBBB in asymptomatic individuals should alert clinicians to cardiovascular risk.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraventricular Conduction Delay in a Standard 12-Lead Electrocardiogram as a Predictor of Mortality in the General PopulationCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2011
- Relation of Bundle Branch Block to Long-Term (Four-Year) Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Systolic Heart FailureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2011
- Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Severe versus Mild or Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Followed in an Academic Outpatient Pulmonary ClinicAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 2011
- Bundle branch block patterns and long-term outcomes in heart failureInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2011
- Addition of the Electrocardiogram to the Preparticipation Examination of College AthletesClinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2010
- Association of Uncomplicated Electrocardiographic Conduction Blocks With Subsequent Cardiac Morbidity in a Community-Based Population (Olmsted County, Minnesota)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2008
- The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics A comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Natural history of isolated bundle branch blockThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Characteristics and prognosis of incomplete right bundle branch block: An epidemiologic studyJACC, 1986
- A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block.Circulation, 1975