The effects of the shook swarm technique on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colony productivity and honey quality
Author:
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Apicultural Research
- Vol. 47 (1) , 27-34
Abstract
The productivity of honey bee colonies and the quality of hive products may be greatly influenced by colony management. In beekeeping, shaking of the worker bees together with the queen into a clean empty hive is known as the shook swarm technique. In this study, the shook swarm technique was compared to standard beekeeping methods in relation to colony productivity and honey quality, including adult worker bee population, wax production, comb area, brood area and honey yield. In addition, the honey was examined to determine the content of water, proline, hydroxymethylfurfural, glucose, fructose, sucrose, diastase, electrical conductivity, invert sugar, fructose/glucose ratio, maltose, vitamin C and potassium. The naphthalene and pesticide contents were also measured. Shook swarm group colonies were smaller than those of the control group in terms of worker bee population, brood area and honey yield (P0.05) and greater in terms of wax production (P<0.01). Ninety five per cent of the comb needed by the colonies was built within 45–50 days, at an average cost of 19–20 kg of honey. Control colonies used an average of 79g of wax to build comb on each frame of foundation, compared to 183g in the shaken colonies. Honey production to comply with pure blossom and organic standards may be possible using the shook swarm technique, but the productivity level is 55–60% lower than with standard beekeeping methods.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Shaking Signal of the Honey Bee Informs Workers to Prepare for Greater ActivityEthology, 2010
- Effects of comb age on honey bee colony growth and brood survivorshipJournal of Apicultural Research, 2001
- Optimal timing of comb construction by honeybee ( Apis mellifera ) colonies: a dynamic programming model and experimental testsBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1999
- Honey Bee Colonies are Group‐Level Adaptive UnitsThe American Naturalist, 1997
- Honey bee foragers as sensory units of their coloniesBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1994
- Construction defects define pattern and method in comb building by honeybeesApidologie, 1991
- Nectar Storage in Relation to Wax Secretion by HoneybeesJournal of Apicultural Research, 1988
- The influence of swarm size on brood production and emergent worker weight in newly founded honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.)Insectes Sociaux, 1985
- Survival of honeybees in cold climates: the critical timing of colony growth and reproductionEcological Entomology, 1985
- The nest of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.)Insectes Sociaux, 1976