Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not
Authors:
- Ensar AcemEAEnsar Acem
- Balazs AczelBABalazs Aczel
- Nihan AlbayrakNANihan Albayrak
- Nicholas J. L. BrownNBNicholas J. L. Brown
- Leonie A. DuddaLDLeonie A. Dudda
- Mahmoud Medhat ElsherifMEMahmoud Medhat Elsherif
- Biljana GjoneskaBGBiljana Gjoneska
- Marta KowalMKMarta Kowal
- Anand KrishnaAKAnand Krishna
- Szymon MiłkośSMSzymon Miłkoś
- Mariola Paruzel-CzachuraMPMariola Paruzel-Czachura
- Jay PatelJPJay Patel
Open Access
- 11 November 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Theory and Society
- Vol. 54 (6) , 1137-1172
Abstract
Academic publishing is both an indication of scientific contribution and a currency for career advancement. This dual role gives rise to a normative scientific conflict: Does the structural incentive to publish constitute a conflict of interest (COI) that ought to be disclosed? In this paper, we address this conflict through an action research approach, engaging collaboratively and reflexively to answer four related questions: (1) What evidence suggests that researchers face a (financial) COI when publishing? (2) What are the benefits and drawbacks of explicitly acknowledging that publications function as academic currency? (3) How should such conflicts be disclosed? (4) Do mechanisms such as pre-registration and registered reports resolve these concerns? This paper contends that while researchers are clearly incentivised to publish, this interest need not necessarily constitute a conflict or be explicitly disclosed. Treating this issue as a normative scientific conflict does reveal the need for a shift in how researchers understand and navigate the subjective, self-interested dimensions of their work. We propose four key responses: (1) integrating discussions of COIs and biases more extensively into undergraduate science education, (2) promoting greater reflexivity in everyday research practice (e.g., through reflexivity journals, peer-led audit groups, and the reintegration of discussions on the historicity and cultural nature of research into scientific publications), (3) critically investigating institutional incentives and journal policies, and (4) proactively adopting methodological safeguards such as pre-registration. By addressing this conflict through action research, we demonstrate how normative tensions in science can be made productive — supporting both critical reflection and structural improvement.Keywords
Funding Information
- Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Starter Grant)
- Leverhulme Trust (Early Career Award)
- Foundation For Polish Science (START scholarship)
This publication has 137 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews: associations with results, conclusions, and methodological qualityCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019
- The Unintended Consequences of Conflict of Interest DisclosureJAMA, 2012
- Pathways to equity in mathematics education: how life experiences impact researcher positionalityEducational Studies in Mathematics, 2011
- Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data2009
- Everyone's a Little Bit Biased (Even Physicians)JAMA, 2008
- Impugning the Integrity of Medical ScienceJAMA, 2008
- Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical ResearchJAMA, 2003
- Interdisziplinarität und Disziplinarität1998
- Minimizing the Three Stages of Publication BiasJAMA, 1990
- The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino ratSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 1963