The removal of failed asylum seekers
Author:
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Legal Studies
- Vol. 25 (1) , 117-141
Abstract
Many human and financial resources are being spent on the asylum determination and appeal processes in order to distinguish those asylum applicants who require protection from those who do not. However, the majority of failed asylum seekers do not leave the country. The lack of an effective removal policy defeats the purpose of having an asylum system at all. In other words, removals of failed asylum seekers are essential to preserve the integrity and credibility of the asylum system. Since forced removals are a crucial component of our asylum system, this paper seeks to examine how they can be made more eflcient and humane. In particular, it examines the recent measures adopted through the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Act 2004 and proposed measures currently debated at the EU level.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enlarging ‘Fortress Europe’: Eu Accession, Asylum, and Immigration in Candidate CountriesInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2003
- Readmission Agreements. The Case of MoroccoEuropean Journal of Migration and Law, 2003
- Passing the Buck: A Critical Analysis of the Readmission Policy Implemented by the European Union and Its Member StatesEuropean Journal of Migration and Law, 2003
- Community Readmission Agreements with Third Countries–Objectives, Substance and Current State of NegotiationsEuropean Journal of Migration and Law, 2003
- Visions of the Exceptional: Legal and Theoretical Issues Raised by Transit Processing Centres and Protection ZonesEuropean Journal of Migration and Law, 2003