Effectiveness of Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, or Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 48 (6) , 1948-52
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare, in a rabbit keratitis model, the levels of effectiveness of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates of diverse antibiotic susceptibilities. Rabbit eyes were intrastromally injected with approximately 100 CFU of methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSSA or MRSA, respectively) organisms that were either sensitive or resistant to ofloxacin. One drop of moxifloxacin (0.5%), levofloxacin (0.5%), or ciprofloxacin (0.3%) was topically applied hourly from 4 to 9 (early) or 10 to 15 (late) h postinfection. At 1 h after cessation of therapy, the corneas were harvested, and the number of CFU per cornea was determined. For the ofloxacin-sensitive strains, early treatment of MSSA or MRSA with moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin produced approximately a 5-log decrease in CFU per cornea relative to that in untreated eyes ( P ≤ 0.0001). For late therapy of ofloxacin-sensitive strains, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin produced approximately 5-, 4-, and 2- to 3-log reductions in CFU per cornea, respectively ( P ≤ 0.0001). Early treatment of the ofloxacin-resistant strains with either moxifloxacin or levofloxacin produced a ≥4-log or ≥3-log decrease, respectively, in the MSSA or MRSA strains ( P ≤ 0.0001), whereas ciprofloxacin treatment produced a 1-log decrease in CFU per cornea relative to that in untreated eyes ( P = 0.1540). For late treatment of ofloxacin-resistant strains, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin failed to significantly reduce the number of CFU per cornea ( P ≥ 0.3627), whereas moxifloxacin produced a significant reduction in CFU per cornea of approximately 1 log ( P ≤ 0.0194). Therefore, for three of the four treatments tested, moxifloxacin demonstrated greater effectiveness than either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Three Newer Fluoroquinolones versus Six Strains of Staphylococci in an In Vitro Model under Aerobic and Anaerobic ConditionsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Fourth generation fluoroquinolones: new weapons in the arsenal of ophthalmic antibioticsAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Target Preference of 15 Quinolones againstStaphylococcus aureus, Based on Antibacterial Activities and Target InhibitionAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic ModelClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in South Florida and emerging resistance to fluoroquinolonesOphthalmology, 2000
- The comparative antimicrobial activity of levofloxacin tested against 350 clinical isolates of streptococciDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1996
- LevofloxacinDrugs, 1994
- The role of topoisomerase IV in partitioning bacterial replicons and the structure of catenated intermediates in DNA replicationCell, 1992
- gyrA Mutations in Ciprofloxacin-Resistant, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Indiana, Minnesota, and TennesseeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Cryptic α‐toxin gene in toxic shock syndrome and septicaemia strains of Staphylococcus aureusMolecular Microbiology, 1990