“Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
Open Access
- 26 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (6) , e0198483
Abstract
Office workers spend most of their working day sitting, and prolonged sitting has been associated with increased risk of poor health. Standing in meetings has been proposed as a strategy by which to reduce workplace sitting but little is known about the standing experience. This study documented workers’ experiences of standing in normally seated meetings. Twenty-five participants (18+ years), recruited from three UK universities, volunteered to stand in 3 separate, seated meetings that they were already scheduled to attend. They were instructed to stand when and for however long they deemed appropriate, and gave semi-structured interviews after each meeting. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis. Four themes, central to the experience of standing in meetings, were extracted: physical challenges to standing; implications of standing for meeting engagement; standing as norm violation; and standing as appropriation of power. Participants typically experienced some physical discomfort from prolonged standing, apparently due to choosing to stand for as long as possible, and noted practical difficulties of fully engaging in meetings while standing. Many participants experienced marked psychological discomfort due to concern at being seen to be violating a strong perceived sitting norm. While standing when leading the meeting was felt to confer a sense of power and control, when not leading the meeting participants felt uncomfortable at being misperceived to be challenging the authority of other attendees. These findings reveal important barriers to standing in normally-seated meetings, and suggest strategies for acclimatising to standing during meetings. Physical discomfort might be offset by building standing time slowly and incorporating more sit-stand transitions. Psychological discomfort may be lessened by notifying other attendees about intentions to stand. Organisational buy-in to promotional strategies for standing may be required to dispel perceptions of sitting norms, and to progress a wider workplace health and wellbeing agenda.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council (MR/N008979/1)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does an ‘Activity-Permissive’ Workplace Change Office Workers’ Sitting and Activity Time?PLOS ONE, 2013
- Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health researchBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplaceBMC Public Health, 2013
- Reducing Occupational Sitting Time and Improving Worker Health: The Take-a-Stand Project, 2011Preventing Chronic Disease, 2012
- Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting Reduces Postprandial Glucose and Insulin ResponsesDiabetes Care, 2012
- Sedentary Behaviors and Subsequent Health Outcomes in AdultsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011
- The Advantage of Standing Up to Fight and the Evolution of Habitual Bipedalism in HomininsPLOS ONE, 2011
- The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventionsImplementation Science, 2011
- Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative researchQualitative Research, 2001
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991