Inflection Classes, Gender, and the Principle of Contrast
Author:
- Andrew Carstairs-McCarthyACAndrew Carstairs-McCarthy
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language
- Vol. 70 (4) , 737-788
Abstract
Clark's 1987 Principle of Contrast (‘Every two forms contrast in meaning’) seems inconsistent with the widespread synonymy exhibited by inflectional affixes in languages with inflection classes. But if inflection class membership is counted as part of the ‘meaning’ of an inflectional affix under tight conditions—namely if it unambiguously identifies the inflection class of the lexemes to which it attaches—then inflectional affixation is found to comply with the Principle of Contrast after all. A version of the principle extends to covert gender systems too, although apparently not to overt gender systems. Far- reaching implications for morphological theory and grammatical change are suggested. Evidence is drawn in particular from English, German, Icelandic, Latin, Rumanian, Amo, Archi, Andi, Zulu, Georgian, and Afrikaans.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Lexicon in Acquisition1993
- A-Morphous Morphology1992
- The whole-object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings1991
- Morphology1991
- Gender1991
- Paradigm economy: a reply to NymanJournal of Linguistics, 1988
- Schemas in German plural formationLingua, 1988
- Is the Paradigm Economy Principle relevant?Journal of Linguistics, 1987
- Paradigm economyJournal of Linguistics, 1983
- Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics1968