Forest Cover Estimation in Ireland Using Radar Remote Sensing: A Comparative Analysis of Forest Cover Assessment Methodologies
Open Access
- 11 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (8) , e0133583
Abstract
Quantification of spatial and temporal changes in forest cover is an essential component of forest monitoring programs. Due to its cloud free capability, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is an ideal source of information on forest dynamics in countries with near-constant cloud-cover. However, few studies have investigated the use of SAR for forest cover estimation in landscapes with highly sparse and fragmented forest cover. In this study, the potential use of L-band SAR for forest cover estimation in two regions (Longford and Sligo) in Ireland is investigated and compared to forest cover estimates derived from three national (Forestry2010, Prime2, National Forest Inventory), one pan-European (Forest Map 2006) and one global forest cover (Global Forest Change) product. Two machine-learning approaches (Random Forests and Extremely Randomised Trees) are evaluated. Both Random Forests and Extremely Randomised Trees classification accuracies were high (98.1–98.5%), with differences between the two classifiers being minimal (<0.5%). Increasing levels of post classification filtering led to a decrease in estimated forest area and an increase in overall accuracy of SAR-derived forest cover maps. All forest cover products were evaluated using an independent validation dataset. For the Longford region, the highest overall accuracy was recorded with the Forestry2010 dataset (97.42%) whereas in Sligo, highest overall accuracy was obtained for the Prime2 dataset (97.43%), although accuracies of SAR-derived forest maps were comparable. Our findings indicate that spaceborne radar could aid inventories in regions with low levels of forest cover in fragmented landscapes. The reduced accuracies observed for the global and pan-continental forest cover maps in comparison to national and SAR-derived forest maps indicate that caution should be exercised when applying these datasets for national reporting.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forestry in the Republic of Ireland: Government policy, grant incentives and carbon sequestration valueLand Use Policy, 2013
- The Performance of Random Forests in an Operational Setting for Large Area Sclerophyll Forest ClassificationRemote Sensing, 2013
- Prediction of plot-level forest variables using TerraSAR-X stereo SAR dataRemote Sensing of Environment, 2012
- Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+Carbon Balance and Management, 2011
- The meaning of the 'impact factor' in the case of an open-access journalCarbon Balance and Management, 2011
- Inferring Regulatory Networks from Expression Data Using Tree-Based MethodsPLOS ONE, 2010
- Quantification of global gross forest cover lossProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed dataProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Random subwindows and extremely randomized trees for image classification in cell biologyBMC Cell Biology, 2007
- Omissions, commissions, and decisions: the need for integrated resource assessmentsForest Ecology and Management, 2000