Accretion History of AGNs: A Multiwavelength Comparison of X-Ray- and Infrared-selected AGNs
Authors:
- Thresa KellyThresa Kelly
- Connor AugeConnor Auge
- David SandersDavid Sanders
- Allison KirkpatrickAllison Kirkpatrick
- Christopher M. CarrollCCChristopher M. Carroll
- C. Megan UrryC. Megan Urry
- Nico CappellutiNico Cappelluti
- Tonima Tasnim AnannaTonima Tasnim Ananna
- Mislav BalokovićMBMislav Baloković
- Médéric BoquienMédéric Boquien
- Brandon ColemanBrandon Coleman
- Ryan HickoxRyan Hickox
Open Access
- 30 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 997 (2) , 366
Abstract
Identifying active galactic nuclei (AGNs) using only one wavelength region may miss AGNs with characteristics unfavorable for the identification method, which introduces bias in the sample. To better understand these selection effects, we compare the multiwavelength properties of 2584 X-ray- and IR-selected AGNs at z < 3 in the COSMOS field. The X-ray-selected sample consists of the 2219 AGNs with intrinsic 0.5–10 keV X-ray luminosity greater than 10 43 erg s −1 ; the 993 IR-selected AGNs are identified by their high-contrast, power-law IR colors using Spitzer/IRAC observations. We find that both selection methods miss a significant fraction of AGNs, as only 24.3% of AGNs (628 out of the total of 2584 AGNs) are recovered by both selection criteria. X-ray selection can capture the most diverse range of multiwavelength spectral emission features, while IRAC selection is biased against AGNs with a steeply decreasing power flux ( λF λ ) between 1 and 6 μ m. For AGNs with X-ray detections, IRAC-selected sources are 2.5× more X-ray luminous than AGNs not identified by their IR colors. IRAC-selected AGNs without detectable X-rays are obscured, as they have a mean X-ray correction factor log ( L X , obs / L X , int ) = −1.4; 28.5%–42.2% of these AGNs are Compton-thick (according to estimated column densities). Only 1.4% of X-ray-selected AGNs are Compton-thick. The AGN selection technique used significantly impacts the overall characteristics of the resulting AGN sample.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (2050710)
- National Science Foundation (2139292)
- National Science Foundation (1716994)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC19K1022)
- National Science Foundation (1715512)
- National Science Foundation (2407751)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC23K0488)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC23K0486)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC22K0793)
- ANID BASAL project (FB210003)
- Fondecyt Regular Program (1200495)
- Fondecyt Regular Program (1241005)
- Fondecyt Regular Program (1250821)
This publication has 96 references indexed in Scilit:
- Array programming with NumPyNature, 2020
- Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 2017
- Observational Appearance of Black Holes in X-Ray Binaries and AGNSpace Science Reviews, 2014
- On-sky characterisation of the VISTA NB118 narrow-band filters at 1.19 μmAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2013
- Astropy: A community Python package for astronomyAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2013
- UltraVISTA: a new ultra-deep near-infrared survey in COSMOSAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2012
- AHerschelview of the far-infrared properties of submillimetre galaxiesAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2012
- The XMM-Newton wide-field survey in the COSMOS fieldAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2009
- Compton-Thick AGN: The Dark Side of the X-Ray Background2004
- Measuring the redshift evolution of clustering: the Hubble Deep Field SouthMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2002