Minority stress and relationship satisfaction in same‐sex couples: A meta‐analysis
- 27 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Family Relations
- Vol. 73 (5) , 2996-3014
Abstract
Objective: The present study conducted a meta‐analysis to synthesize the associations between sexual minority stress and relationship satisfaction, as well as to examine actor and partner effects.Background: Sexual minority individuals in same‐sex couples experience various distinct and chronic stressors related to their stigmatized identities and romantic relationships, and these stressors negatively impact relationship satisfaction. Although there have been two meta‐analyses that sought to examine these influences, some fundamental questions remain unanswered. In particular, the roles of dyadic processes and different types of sexual minority stressors remain unclear.Method: A comprehensive search identified 67 studies with 147 effect sizes representing 24,542 individuals.Results: The results revealed a significant small association (r = −.100 to −.188) between sexual minority stressors and relationship satisfaction. Internalized stressors were more strongly associated with relationship satisfaction than other types of sexual minority stressors (e.g., prejudice events and concealment). Dyadic analyses demonstrated a significant actor effect of concealment, experiencing prejudice events, and internalized stressors on relationship satisfaction, with the largest effect size for concealment effects.Conclusion: These findings suggest that sexual minority stressors could potentially contribute to same‐sex relational problems. They also underscore the importance of interdependence (both partners' responses as well as their interaction with sexual minority stressors). This understanding may be instrumental in shaping prevention strategies.Implications: The meta‐analysis emphasizes the nuanced impact of sexual minority stressors on same‐sex relationship satisfaction, highlighting the importance of targeted interventions. It underscores the role of dyadic processes, emphasizing the significance of both partners' responses and interactions with stressors in developing effective prevention strategies for healthier same‐sex relationships.Keywords
This publication has 93 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Global Attitudes Toward Homosexuality: A Critical Review of LGBT Indexes2022
- Coping with minority stress in romantic relationships among lesbian, gay and bisexual peopleCurrent Psychology, 2020
- Lesbian and Gay Relationship Satisfaction Among Italians: Adult Attachment, Social Support, and Internalized StigmaArchives of Sexual Behavior, 2020
- Minority Stress in Older Portuguese Gay and Bisexual Men and Its Impact on Sexual and Relationship SatisfactionSexuality Research and Social Policy, 2019
- Same-sex relationships and minority stressCurrent Opinion in Psychology, 2017
- A tool for help or harm? How associations between social networking use, social support, and mental health differ for sexual minority and heterosexual youthComputers in Human Behavior, 2016
- An Exploratory Model of Proximal Minority Stress and the Work–Life Interface for Men in Same‐Sex, Dual‐Earner RelationshipsJournal of Counseling & Development, 2015
- Relationship Satisfaction2014
- Fear of Intimacy as a Mediator of the Internalized Heterosexism-Relationship Quality Link Among Men in Same-Sex RelationshipsContemporary Family Therapy, 2013
- Does Internalized Heterosexism Moderate the Link Between Heterosexist Events and Lesbians' Psychological Distress?Sex Roles, 2006