Weighing private preferences in public sector safety decisions: some reflections on the practical application of the willingness-to-pay approach
- 31 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural Public Policy
- Vol. 1 (1) , 122-142
Abstract
Viewed from both an ethical and practical perspective, it is clearly desirable that public sector allocative and regulatory decisions should, so far as possible, reflect the preferences of individual members of society. It is therefore hardly surprising that, in appraising proposed safety improvements, public sector bodies have displayed an increasing tendency to estimate the benefits of such improvements on the basis of values of safety defined in such a way as to reflect the preferences and attitudes to safety of individual members of the public. However, given the technical complexity of many public sector safety decisions, it is also necessary to rely on expert analysis and informed judgement in reaching such decisions, so that preference-based values of safety should be regarded as being only one input to the decision-making process. In addition, the definition and estimation of the values themselves raise a number of practical and ethical questions. The purpose of this paper is to consider the role that preference-based values of safety can realistically be expected to play in these decision-making processes, given these difficulties and limitations.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computing what the public wants: Some issues in road safety cost–benefit analysisAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2011
- Euthanizing the Value of a Statistical LifeReview of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2010
- The role of social cost–benefit analysis in societal decision-making under large uncertainties with application to robbery at a cash depotReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009
- (How) Can we value health, safety and the environment?Journal of Economic Psychology, 2006
- Dread risksJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2006
- Effects of Disease Type and Latency on the Value of Mortality RiskJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2004
- A Note on Luce-Fishburn Axiomatization of Rank-Dependent UtilityJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2004
- On Justifying Cost‐Benefit AnalysisThe Journal of Legal Studies, 2000
- Rational Risk PolicyJournal of Risk and Insurance, 2000
- Preferences for life saving programs: how the public discounts time and ageJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1994