Inflation in 2022 did not affect congressional voting, but abortion did
Open Access
- 13 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 121 (21)
Abstract
This study examines voting in the 2022 United States congressional elections, contests that were widely expected to produce a sizable defeat for Democratic candidates for largely economic reasons. Based on a representative national probability sample of voters interviewed in both 2020 and 2022, individuals who changed their vote from one party's congressional candidate to another party’s candidate did not do so in response to the salience of inflation or declining economic conditions. Instead, we find strong evidence that views on abortion were central to shifting votes in the midterm elections. Americans who favored (opposed) legal abortions were more likely to shift from voting for Republican (Democratic) candidates in 2020 to Democratic (Republican) candidates in 2022. Since a larger number of Americans supported than opposed legal abortions, the combination of these shifts ultimately improved the electoral prospects of Democratic candidates. New voters were especially likely to weigh abortion views heavily in their vote-shifting calculus. Likewise, those respondents whose confidence in the US Supreme Court declined from 2020 to 2022 were more likely to shift from voting for Republican to Democratic congressional candidates. We provide direct empirical evidence that changes in support for the Supreme Court, a nonpartisan branch of the federal government, are implicated in partisan voting behavior in another branch of government. We explore the implications of these findings for prevalent assumptions about how economic conditions influence voting, as well as for the relationship between the judiciary and electoral politics.Keywords
Funding Information
- Institute for the Study of Citizens and Politics (na)
- Browne Center for International Politics (na)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The 2022 Elections: A Test of Democracy's Resilience and the Referendum Theory of MidtermsPolitical Science Quarterly, 2023
- More Important, but for What Exactly? The Insignificant Role of Subjective Issue Importance in Vote DecisionsPolitical Behavior, 2018
- Bias Will Find a Way: Economic Perceptions, Attributions of Blame, and Partisan-Motivated Reasoning during CrisisThe Journal of Politics, 2015
- It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in US House ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 2015
- The nature of economic perceptions in mass publicsElectoral Studies, 2013
- Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. Presidential Election CycleThe Journal of Politics, 2010
- Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility AttributionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2003
- The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- The Importance of Being Republican: Forecasting Party Fortunes in House Midterm ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 1997
- Sociotropic Politics: The American CaseBritish Journal of Political Science, 1981