Governing Boring Apocalypses: A new typology of existential vulnerabilities and exposures for existential risk research
Authors:
- Hin-Yan LiuHLHin-Yan Liu
- Kristian Cedervall LautaKLKristian Cedervall Lauta
- Matthijs Michiel MaasMMMatthijs Michiel Maas
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- The Centre for the Study of Existential Risks
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Globally networked risks and how to respondNature, 2013
- Existential Risk Prevention as Global PriorityGlobal Policy, 2013
- Thinking Inside the Box: Controlling and Using an Oracle AIMinds and Machines, 2012
- The Superintelligent Will: Motivation and Instrumental Rationality in Advanced Artificial AgentsMinds and Machines, 2012
- How long until human-level AI? Results from an expert assessmentTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 2011
- Probing the improbable: methodological challenges for risks with low probabilities and high stakesJournal of Risk Research, 2010
- Reducing the Risk of Human ExtinctionRisk Analysis, 2007
- The Next 50 Years: Fatal DiscontinuitiesPopulation and Development Review, 2005
- Should we be very cautious or extremely cautious on measures that may involve our destruction?Social Choice and Welfare, 1991
- Nuclear War and Climatic Catastrophe: Some Policy ImplicationsForeign Affairs, 1983