Rankings
Publications
Search Publications
Cited-by Search
Sources
Publishers
Scholars
Scholars
Top Cited Scholars
Organizations
About
Scilit
About Us
Advisory Board
Data Sources
Career
Support / Contact
User Guide
Publisher User
Search Function
Rankings Function
API Resource
Scilit Knowledge
Metrics
Scilit Recognitions
Publications Classification
Media
News
Blog
Login
Register
Home
Publications
The Ethical Implications of Proportioning Punishment to Deontological Desert
Home
Publications
The Ethical Implications of Proportioning Punishment to Deontological Desert
The Ethical Implications of Proportioning Punishment to Deontological Desert
Authors:
HH
Heidi M. Hurd
Heidi M. Hurd
MM
Michael S. Moore
Michael S. Moore
Article Alert
Citation Alert
Add to Library
Cite
Download
Share
Download
Download PDF
Download
Publisher website
Google Scholar
10 April 2021
journal article
research article
Published by
Springer Nature
in
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Vol. 15
(3)
,
495-514
DOI:
10.1007/s11572-021-09569-6
Abstract
No abstract available
Keywords
PROPORTIONALITY
DEONTOLOGY
WRONGDOING
CULPABILITY
ABSOLUTISM
THRESHOLD-DEONTOLOGY
Cited
Cited by 4 articles
Scroll to top