Pesticide exposure assessment in rice paddies in Europe: a comparative study of existing mathematical models
- 23 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pest Management Science
- Vol. 62 (7) , 624-636
Abstract
A comparative test was undertaken in order to identify the potential of existing mathematical models, including the rice water quality (RICEWQ) 1.6.4v model, the pesticide concentration in paddy field (PCPF‐1) model and the surface water and groundwater (SWAGW) model, for calculating pesticide dissipation and exposure in rice paddies in Europe. Previous versions of RICEWQ and PCPF‐1 models had been validated under European and Japanese conditions respectively, unlike the SWAGW model which was only recently developed as a tier‐2 modelling tool. Two datasets, derived from field dissipation studies undertaken in northern Italy with the herbicides cinosulfuron and pretilachlor, were used for the modelling exercise. All models were parameterized according to field experimentations, as far as possible, considering their individual deficiencies. Models were not calibrated against field data in order to remove bias in the comparison of the results. RICEWQ 1.6.4v provided the highest agreement between measured and predicted pesticide concentrations in both paddy water and paddy soil, with modelling efficiency (EF) values ranging from 0.78 to 0.93. PCPF‐1 simulated well the dissipation of herbicides in paddy water, but significantly underestimated the concentrations of pretilachlor, a chemical with high affinity for soil sorption, in paddy soil. SWAGW simulated relatively well the dissipation of both herbicides in paddy water, and especially pretilachlor, but failed to predict closely the pesticide dissipation in paddy soil. Both RICEWQ and SWAGW provided low groundwater (GW) predicted environmental concentrations (PECs), suggesting a low risk of GW contamination for the two herbicides. Overall, this modelling exercise suggested that RICEWQ 1.6.4v is currently the most reliable model for higher‐tier exposure assessment in rice paddies in Europe. PCPF‐1 and SWAGW showed promising results, but further adjustments are required before these models can be considered as strong candidates for inclusion in the higher‐tier pesticide regulatory scheme. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical IndustryKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The development of a coupled model (PCPF-SWMS) to simulate water flow and pollutant transport in Japanese paddy fieldsPaddy and Water Environment, 2006
- Simulation of mefenacet concentrations in paddy fields by an improved PCPF‐1 modelPest Management Science, 2005
- Dissipation of pretilachlor in paddy water and sedimentAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 2004
- The potential of pesticides to contaminate the groundwater resources of the Axios river basin. Part II. Monitoring study in the south part of the basinScience of The Total Environment, 2004
- Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modellingScience of The Total Environment, 2003
- Pesticides in Portuguese surface and ground watersWater Research, 2003
- RadEst3.00: software to estimate daily radiation data from commonly available meteorological variablesEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2003
- SOILPAR 2.00: software to estimate soil hydrological parameters and functionsEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2003
- Modelling pesticide fate in rice paddyAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 2002
- Pattern and Rate of Dissipation of Pretilachlor and Mefenacet in Plow Layer and Paddy Water under Lowland Field Conditions: A Three-year StudyJournal of Pesticide Science, 2000