Troubling the Neandertals: A Reply to Langbroek's ‘The Trouble with Neandertals’
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Archaeological Dialogues
- Vol. 8 (2) , 135-142
Abstract
We cannot but agree with the basic contentions of Langbroek's paper that 1) the replacement of Neandertals by early modern humans in Europe is best understood from a perspective of historical contingency and 2) that it must have had a lot to do with the ‘very dynamic spatio-temporal redrawings of the population maps of Europe during the Weichsel glacial’ against the background of ‘the emergence of increasing climatological instability during the later part of OIS 3, with significant fluctuations at relatively short timescales’. This is the kind of approach we have been advocating to effectively supersede the reductionist ‘superiority’ paradigm that has dominated the literature on Neandertal extinction for the last twenty years.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- O Menino do LapedoArchaeological Dialogues, 2001
- Modern Human Ancestry at the Peripheries: A Test of the Replacement TheoryScience, 2001
- A view of Neandertal genetic diversityNature Genetics, 2000
- Age of the Lake Mungo 3 skeleton, reply to Bowler & Magee and to Gillespie & RobertsJournal of Human Evolution, 2000
- Adults only. Reindeer hunting at the Middle Palaeolithic site Salzgitter Lebenstedt, Northern GermanyJournal of Human Evolution, 2000
- Australia's oldest human remains: age of the Lake Mungo 3 skeletonJournal of Human Evolution, 1999
- On the Probability of Neanderthal AncestryThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene HomoNature, 1997
- Palaeolithic landscapes of Europe and environs, 150,000-25,000 years ago: An overviewQuaternary Science Reviews, 1996
- Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250-kyr ice-core recordNature, 1993