A Meta-Analysis Comparing Breast Conservation Therapy Alone to the Oncoplastic Technique
Authors:
- Claire S. DugalCDClaire S. Dugal
- Toncred M. StybloTSToncred M. Styblo
- Grant W. CarlsonGCGrant W. Carlson
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 72 (2) , 145-149
Abstract
When immediate reconstruction is applied to breast conservation therapy (BCT), the benefits extend well beyond the minimization of poor cosmetic results. The purpose of this analysis was to compare literature outcomes between BCT alone and BCT with the oncoplastic approach. A meta-analysis was performed in PubMed using key words "oncoplastic," "partial breast reconstruction," and "breast conservation therapy." Case reports, series with less than 10 patients, and those with less than 1-year follow-up were excluded from the analysis. The 3 comparative groups included BCT with oncoplastic reduction techniques (Group A), BCT with oncoplastic flap techniques (Group B), and BCT alone (Group C). Comparisons were made on 3165 patients in the BCT with oncoplastic group (Groups A and B, 41 papers) and 5494 patients in the BCT alone group (Group C, 20 papers). Demographics were similar, and tumor size was larger in the oncoplastic group (2.7 vs 1.2 cm). The weight of the lumpectomy specimen was 4 times larger in the oncoplastic group. The positive margin rate was significantly lower in the oncoplastic group (12% vs 21%, P < 0.0001). Reexcision was more common in the BCT alone group (14.6% vs 4%, P < 0.0001), however, completion mastectomy was more common in the oncoplastic group (6.5% vs 3.79%, P < 0.0001). The average follow-up was longer in the BCT alone group (64 vs 37 months). Local recurrence was 4% in the oncoplastic group and 7% in the BCT alone group. Satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome was significantly higher in the oncoplastic group (89.5% vs 82.9%, P < 0.001). The oncoplastic approach to BCT allows a generous resection with subsequent reduction in positive margins. The true value on local recurrence remains to be determined. Patients are more satisfied with outcomes when the oncoplastic approach is used.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Partial Breast Reconstruction With Mini Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery and Mini Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator FlapsAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2010
- The Benefits of Partial versus Total Breast Reconstruction for Women with MacromastiaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Oncoplastic Breast Surgery for Cancer: Analysis of 540 Consecutive CasesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- An oncoplastic procedure for central and medio-cranial breast cancerEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgeryThe Breast, 2007
- Role for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving SurgeryAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategiesAnz Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Influence of Margin Width on Local Control of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the BreastNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801European Journal of Cancer, 1998