Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Authors:
- Joel M.H. TeichmanJTJoel M.H. Teichman
- Pratap K. ReddyPRPratap K. Reddy
- John C. HulbertJHJohn C. Hulbert
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value of Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy in Conjunction with Radical Perineal or Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1994
- Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: A Viable Alternative to Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1994
- Initial Experience with Staging Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Performed at the Time of Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Prostatic AdenocarcinomaJournal of Endourology, 1992
- Radical Prostatectomy: the Pros and Cons of the Perineal Versus Retropubic ApproachJournal of Urology, 1992
- Radical Prostatectomy for Clinical Stage T1-2N0M0 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Long-Term ResultsJournal of Urology, 1990
- Potency-Sparing Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: Anatomy, Surgical Technique and Initial ResultsJournal of Urology, 1988
- Technical Nuances and Surgical Results of Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy in 150 PatientsJournal of Urology, 1987
- Total Prostatectomy for Localized Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1984
- Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight Into Etiology and PreventionJournal of Urology, 1982
- An Anatomical Approach to the Surgical Management of the Dorsal Vein and Santorini’s Plexus During Radical Retropubic SurgeryJournal of Urology, 1979