Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in critically ill adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- 25 November 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 48 (2) , 137-147
Abstract
Purpose Systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of noninvasive respiratory strategies, including noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), in reducing extubation failure among critically ill adults. Methods We searched databases from inception through October 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating noninvasive respiratory support therapies (NIPPV, HFNC, conventional oxygen therapy, or a combination of these) following extubation in critically ill adults. Two reviewers performed screening, full text review, and extraction independently. The primary outcome of interest was reintubation. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of our findings. Results We included 36 RCTs (6806 patients). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy, NIPPV (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.52–0.82]) and HFNC (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.45–0.87]) reduced reintubation (both moderate certainty). Sensitivity analyses showed that the magnitude of the effect was highest in patients with increased baseline risk of reintubation. As compared to HFNC, no difference in incidence of reintubation was seen with NIPPV (OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.78–1.38], low certainty). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy, neither NIPPV (OR 0.8 [95% CI 0.61–1.04], moderate certainty) or HFNC (OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.66–1.24], low certainty) reduced short-term mortality. Consistent findings were demonstrated across multiple subgroups, including high- and low-risk patients. These results were replicated when evaluating noninvasive strategies for prevention (prophylaxis), but not in rescue (application only after evidence of deterioration) situations. Conclusions Our findings suggest that both NIPPV and HFNC reduced reintubation in critically ill adults, compared to conventional oxygen therapy. NIPPV did not reduce incidence of reintubation when compared to HFNC. These findings support the preventative application of noninvasive respiratory support strategies to mitigate extubation failure in critically ill adults, but not in rescue conditions.Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of adding postoperative noninvasive ventilation to usual care to prevent pulmonary complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2013
- Noninvasive ventilation immediately after extubation improves weaning outcome after acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trialCritical Care, 2013
- Noninvasive Ventilation and Weaning in Patients with Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Multicenter TrialAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adultsThe Lancet, 2010
- The epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United States*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment ComparisonsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2006
- A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpointsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients*Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986