A Meta-analysis of Prospective Trials Comparing Percutaneous and Surgical Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients
Authors:
- Bradley D. FreemanBFBradley D. Freeman
- Karen IsabellaKIKaren Isabella
- Natatia LinNLNatatia Lin
- Timothy G. BuchmanTBTimothy G. Buchman
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2000
- Vol. 118 (5) , 1412-1418
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomyCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomyActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1998
- Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Anti-inflammatory therapies to treat sepsis and septic shockCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Comparison of Percutaneous and Surgical TracheostomiesChest, 1996
- Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy With Bronchoscopic Guidance in Critically Ill PatientsArchives of Surgery, 1996
- Bronchoscopic guidance makes percutaneous tracheostomy a safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-teach procedureSurgery, 1995
- A comparison of percutaneous and operative tracheostomies in intensive care patientsCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1995
- Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomyCritical Care Medicine, 1991
- Rules of Evidence and Clinical Recommendations on the Use of Antithrombotic AgentsChest, 1989