I nvestigate D iscuss E stimate A ggregate for structured expert judgement
Authors:
- A.M. HaneaAHA.M. Hanea
- M.F. McBrideMMM.F. McBride
- M.A. BurgmanMBM.A. Burgman
- B.C. WintleB.C. Wintle
- F. FidlerF. Fidler
- L. FlanderLFL. Flander
- C.R. TwardyCTC.R. Twardy
- B. ManningBMB. Manning
- S. MascaroSMS. Mascaro
- 1 January 2017
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Forecasting
- Vol. 33 (1) , 267-279
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Good Things Come to Those Who Weight?Risk Analysis, 2014
- Two Reasons to Make Aggregated Probability Forecasts More ExtremeDecision Analysis, 2014
- Expert Judgment, Meta-analysis, and Participatory Risk AnalysisDecision Analysis, 2012
- Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgmentConservation Letters, 2011
- A route to more tractable expert adviceNature, 2010
- Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage IslandJournal of Applied Ecology, 2009
- TU Delft expert judgment data baseReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008
- Linguistic Uncertainty in Qualitative Risk Analysis and How to Minimize ItAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk AnalysisRisk Analysis, 1999
- VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITYMonthly Weather Review, 1950