Registration of prostate histology images to ex vivo MR images via strand‐shaped fiducials
Authors:
- Eli GibsonEGEli Gibson
- Cathie CrukleyCCCathie Crukley
- Madeleine MoussaMMMadeleine Moussa
- Glenn S. BaumanGBGlenn S. Bauman
- Aaron D. WardAWAaron D. Ward
Open Access
- 31 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 36 (6) , 1402-1412
Abstract
Purpose: To present and evaluate a method for registration of whole‐mount prostate digital histology images to ex vivo magnetic resonance (MR) images.Materials and Methods: Nine radical prostatectomy specimens were marked with 10 strand‐shaped fiducial markers per specimen, imaged with T1‐ and T2‐weighted 3T MRI protocols, sliced at 4.4‐mm intervals, processed for whole‐mount histology, and the resulting histological sections (3–5 per specimen, 34 in total) were digitized. The correspondence between fiducial markers on histology and MR images yielded an initial registration, which was refined by a local optimization technique, yielding the least‐squares best‐fit affine transformation between corresponding fiducial points on histology and MR images. Accuracy was quantified as the postregistration 3D distance between landmarks (3–7 per section, 184 in total) on histology and MR images, and compared to a previous state‐of‐the‐art registration method.Results: The proposed method and previous method had mean (SD) target registration errors of 0.71 (0.38) mm and 1.21 (0.74) mm, respectively, requiring 3 and 11 hours of processing time, respectively.Conclusion: The proposed method registers digital histology to prostate MR images, yielding 70% reduced processing time and mean accuracy sufficient to achieve 85% overlap on histology and ex vivo MR images for a 0.2 cc spherical tumor. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36:1402–1412.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: Can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer?Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010
- Semi‐automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slicesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010
- Device for sectioning prostatectomy specimens to facilitate comparison between histology and in vivo MRIJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010
- A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance -based moldsReview of Scientific Instruments, 2009
- Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristics of histologically defined prostate cancer in humansMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2009
- Registration Methodology for Histological Sections and In Vivo Imaging of Human ProstateAcademic Radiology, 2008
- Registering Histologic and MR Images of Prostate for Image-based Cancer DetectionAcademic Radiology, 2007
- Three-Dimensional Registration of Magnetic Resonance Image Data to Histological Sections with Model-Based EvaluationAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2005
- Mutual Information for Automated Unwarping of Rat Brain AutoradiographsNeuroImage, 1997
- Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996