FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE‐MIDWIVES
Author:
- American College of Nurse MidwivesAMAmerican College of Nurse Midwives
- 6 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Vol. 52 (3) , 314-319
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: Is there evidence of an association?The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2006
- ACOG Practice Bulletin #70Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Monitoring The Fetus In Labor: Evidence to Support the MethodsJournal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 2001
- FETAL HEART RATE AUSCULTATION: CURRENT AND FUTURE PRACTICEJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 2000
- Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birthAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- The accuracy of auscultatory detection of fetal cardiacdecelerations: A computer simulationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations: An alternative to the nonstress testJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1991
- Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations Part II. An alternative to the nonstress testJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1986
- Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations Part I. Accuracy and documentationJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1986
- The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoringAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985