The student prompt: Student feedback and change in teaching practices in postsecondary computer science
Authors:
- 1 October 2014
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 1-8
Abstract
Research on retaining students in computer science is clear: pedagogical and curricular interventions that are experienced by all students are the most effective. Yet understanding what brings faculty to modify their teaching practices is scant. This study presents findings from a study based on interviews with 66 computer science professors and instructors in the U.S. Faculty described various sources of student feedback that prompt them to change their teaching practices. Though not originally an interview topic, every instructor mentioned ways in which student feedback instigated change. Faculty described several sources of feedback that influence teaching choices, with the goal of trying to improve their teaching. These include formalized evaluations; feedback inferred from student performance; direct requests from students; and students' nonverbal behavior. As sources of evidence for making decisions about teaching practices, each of these is problematic. We describe what makes them problematic and offer solutions described by faculty interviewed.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Building the Teaching CommonsChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2006
- Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluationsAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2004
- Online Ratings: Fact and FictionNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003
- A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender DifferencesComputer Science Education, 2002
- Encouraging Your Students to Give FeedbackNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
- Toward improving female retention in the computer science majorCommunications of the ACM, 2001
- Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational ContextsAcademy of Management Review, 2000
- Strengthening the case for pair programmingIEEE Software, 2000
- Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility.American Psychologist, 1997
- Using student ratings for teaching improvementNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991