Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Defecatory Disorders
Authors:
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 106 (2) , 315-320
Abstract
Objective: To compare the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in subjects with defecatory disorders with that in control subjects. Methods: In 55 subjects with fecal incontinence, 42 subjects with obstructed defecation, and 45 healthy subjects without defecatory symptoms, a urogynecologist assessed pelvic organ prolapse by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system, and a gastroenterologist evaluated perineal descent during simulated evacuation. A multiple logistic regression model evaluated whether obstetric-gynecological variables, including pelvic organ prolapse, could discriminate among controls, subjects with fecal incontinence, and subjects with obstructed defecation. Results: Fifty-five percent of controls, 42% of those with obstructed defecation, and 29% of those with fecal incontinence had stage II or greater prolapse by clinical examination. Eleven percent of controls, 7% of those with obstructed defecation, and 47% of subjects with fecal incontinence had a forceps delivery. Eighteen percent of controls, 31% of those with obstructed defecation, and 64% of those with fecal incontinence had a hysterectomy. Even after controlling for a higher prevalence of obstetric risk factors and hysterectomy, fecal incontinence was associated with a lower risk of stage II or greater pelvic organ prolapse (odds ratio for fecal incontinence in ≥ stage II pelvic organ prolapse relative to stage 0 pelvic organ prolapse = 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.53). In contrast, pelvic organ prolapse severity was not associated with control versus obstructed defecation status. Seven percent of controls, 18% of subjects with obstructed defecation, and 7% of those with fecal incontinence had increased perineal descent during simulated evacuation. Excessive perineal descent was associated (P < .01) with pelvic organ prolapse. Conclusion: Despite a higher prevalence of risk factors for pelvic floor injury, pelvic organ prolapse severity was lower in those with fecal incontinence than in subjects without bowel symptoms. However, a subset of subjects with defecatory disorders, predominantly obstructed defecation, have excessive perineal descent, which is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Level of Evidence: II-3Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new questionnaire for constipation and faecal incontinenceAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2004
- Fecal incontinence1,2 1Abbreviations used in this paper: EMG, electromyography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; US, ultrasound. 2The author thanks Dr. M. Camilleri for reviewing the manuscript, Dr. J. G. Fletcher for assisting with figures, and Deborah Frank for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.Gastroenterology, 2003
- Prevalence of anal incontinence in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and genital prolapseObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Pelvic organ prolapse in the women's health initiative: Gravity and gravidityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Effect of patient position on clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapseObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Prevalence of Combined Fecal and Urinary Incontinence: A Community‐Based StudyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapseObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Damage to the innervation of the voluntary anal and periurethral sphincter musculature in incontinence: an electrophysiological study.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1984
- Evidence of pudendal neuropathy in patients with perineal descent and chronic straining at stool.Gut, 1984
- Physical Diagnosis in the Evaluation of Vaginal RelaxationClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1972