Contrasting Nutritional Intakes in Sympatric Malagasy Lemurs: Re‐Examining Frugivore and Folivore Strategies and Outcomes Using the “Efficiency‐Velocity” Continuum and Use of Secondary Foods
- 15 July 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Biological Anthropology
- Vol. 190 (3) , e70322
Abstract
Objectives: Primatologists have documented diversity in diet types (frugivore, folivore, etc.) and nutritional differences among those foods, but little is known about intakes (incorporating food compositions and intake amounts). Therefore, how nutritional outcomes and constraints differ across diet types remains poorly understood. We documented diet and nutrient intakes in sympatric lemurs across > 1 year at Tsinjoarivo‐Ambalaomby, Madagascar: Propithecus diadema (folivore) and Eulemur fulvus (frugivore). Materials and Methods: We combined focal animal feeding data with lab analyses to generate daily intakes of food, energy, and nutrients, testing for species and seasonal differences using linear mixed models, and visualizing data using nutritional geometry. Results: E. fulvus consumed 2.7 times more food than P. diadema , accomplished largely through fast intake. E. fulvus had higher energy and nutrient intake; this included three times more protein and higher proportional contribution of protein, despite lower protein in fruit (accomplished by eating more, and supplementing with high‐protein leaves). Lean season response diverged: E. fulvus increased feeding and had similar non‐protein energy but higher protein intakes, while P. diadema decreased effort and tolerated reduced protein and non‐protein energy intakes. Discussion: General fruit‐leaf nutritional differences do not drive nutrient intakes; instead, the “efficiency‐velocity continuum” (frugivores eating more and digesting less fully) is key to understanding frugivore and folivore ecology, including nutrient intakes, food selection rules, and factors limiting abundance. Primate frugivores may not be as protein‐limited as previously assumed. However, future research must examine how absorption rates (across species, habitats, and seasons) affect actual nutrient intakes and energy/nutrient balance.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Geographic Society (9933‐16)
- Eppley Foundation for Research
- Northern Illinois University
- Primate Conservation
- Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex and seasonal differences in diet and nutrient intake in Verreaux's sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi)American Journal of Primatology, 2016
- The importance of protein in leaf selection of folivorous primatesAmerican Journal of Primatology, 2016
- Resource partitioning in sympatric langurs and macaques in tropical rainforests of the central Western Ghats, south IndiaAmerican Journal of Primatology, 2010
- Seasonality, body condition, and timing of reproduction inPropithecus verreauxi verreauxi in the Kirindy ForestAmerican Journal of Primatology, 2005
- Use of total dietary fiber across four lemur species (Propithecus verreauxi coquereli, Hapalemur griseus griseus, Varecia variegata, and Eulemur fulvus): Does fiber type affect digestive efficiency?American Journal of Primatology, 2004
- Characterizing gastrointestinal transit time in four lemur species using barium‐impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS)American Journal of Primatology, 2004
- Description of the gastrointestinal tract of five lemur species: Propithecus tattersalli, Propithecus verreauxi coquereli, Varecia variegata, Hapalemur griseus, and Lemur cattaAmerican Journal of Primatology, 2000
- Effect of dietary fiber concentration on apparent digestibility and digesta passage in non-human primates. II. Hindgut- and foregut-fermenting folivoresZoo Biology, 1999
- Intake, digestibility, and passage of a commercially designed diet by two propithecus speciesAmerican Journal of Primatology, 1999
- Effect of dietary fiber concentration on apparent digestibility and digesta passage in non-human primates. I. Ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata variegataandV. v. rubra)Zoo Biology, 1999