Using document analysis methods and implementation science frameworks to conduct a process evaluation of the community asthma program on the Navajo Nation
Authors:
- 16 January 2025
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Vol. 15 (1)
Abstract
Background: Asthma affects approximately 8.2% of United States school-aged children, with a significantly higher prevalence among socioeconomically disadvantaged minority children. Among Diné (Navajo) children living on the Navajo Nation, asthma rates exceed 20%. The community asthma program (CAP) was developed in partnership with the Navajo Nation following a year-long community engagement process. CAP is a 7-year, multicomponent, evidence-based intervention designed to improve asthma management within Indian Health Service facilities and Diné K-12 schools. Purpose: This study evaluates CAP’s implementation processes and outcomes using document analysis, guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks. We describe our data sources, coding methods, and their contributions to understanding implementation, as well as discuss strengths, limitations, and implications for process evaluation. Methods: CAP research documents were collected from the 2017 community engagement period through the intervention’s conclusion in 2023. When COVID-19 limited access to implementation settings, additional data sources, including email correspondence and meeting minutes, were analyzed using document analysis to examine activities, experiences, and attitudes related to CAP implementation. Results: Multiple data sources, including RE-AIM forms, staff interviews, and research team documents, identified key process indicators and explanatory factors. While these sources provided valuable context, system- and provider-level fidelity indicators are needed to fully assess intervention reach and quality. Conclusions: Findings underscore the importance of collecting process data throughout implementation and leveraging diverse data sources to capture the local implementation context comprehensively. Clinical Trial Information: The Clinical Trials Registration # NCT03377647.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5U01HL138689)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding determinants of lung cancer preventive care in at-risk urban American Indians and Alaska Natives: A mixed-methods studyPreventive Medicine Reports, 2024
- Asthma disparities among U.S. children and adultsJournal of Asthma, 2023
- An asthma collaboration to reduce childhood asthma disparities on the Navajo Nation: Trial protocol for the Community Asthma ProgramPublic Health in Practice, 2022
- COVID-19 on the Navajo Nation: experiences of Diné families of children with asthmaJournal of Asthma, 2022
- Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Explore Palliative Care Program Implementation for American Indian and Alaska Natives throughout the United StatesJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2022
- An introduction to implementation evaluation of school-based interventionsEuropean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2021
- Managing respiratory emergencies at school: A county-wide stock inhaler programJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2021
- Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resourcesJournal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2021
- Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approachHealth Policy and Planning, 2020
- The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?Patient Education and Counseling, 2001