Better Catch Curves: Incorporating Age‐Specific Natural Mortality and Logistic Selectivity
- 11 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Vol. 140 (2) , 356-366
Abstract
Catch‐curve analysis is one of the simplest methods for stock assessment and is widely applied in data‐poor fisheries. Conventional catch‐curve methods rely on the strong assumptions of constant fishing and natural mortality rates above some fully selected age that is usually estimated by visually inspecting a plot of catch at age. Here, we evaluate the performance of three catch‐curve methods that relax or modify these assumptions by (1) estimating logistic selectivity parameters, (2) assuming Lorenzen‐form natural mortality (natural mortality that decreases with weight), and (3) using both methods simultaneously. We used simulation modeling and decision tables to compare estimates of fishing mortality from four catch‐curve methods, including the conventional method, across a variety of observable and unobservable data characteristics. We then applied the methods to catch‐at‐age data for Atlantic menhadenBrevoortia tyrannusfrom the U.S. South Atlantic fishery management region and compared the resulting estimates with published estimates of fishing mortality (F). In our simulation modeling, catch curves that estimated logistic selectivity parameters performed better than those derived by the conventional method when logistic selectivity was present. There was generally little difference in performance between estimates assuming constant natural mortality and those assuming Lorenzen natural mortality. The improvements from estimating selectivity parameters were particularly pronounced when the sample sizes for catch‐at‐age data were large: in those instances, estimating selectivity improved the estimation accuracy forFby nearly 20%. In our example involving Atlantic menhaden, estimates ofFassuming logistic selectivity were most similar to those of published stock assessments, which had previously estimated logistic selectivity at age. We recommend our logistic‐selectivity catch curve when selectivity is likely to be logistic because it improves accuracy at only a very small cost in terms of computational complexity.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Washington
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- An effective harvest strategy using improved catch-curvesFisheries Research, 2010
- Incorporating Time-Varying Catchability into Population Dynamic Stock Assessment ModelsReviews in Fisheries Science, 2009
- Analytical reference points for age-structured models: application to data-poor fisheriesICES Journal of Marine Science, 2009
- Gear selectivity and sample size effects on growth curve selection in shark age and growth studiesFisheries Research, 2009
- Comparison of Reef Fish Catch per Unit Effort and Total Mortality between the 1970s and 2005‐2006 in Onslow Bay, North CarolinaTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2008
- Evaluating Localized vs. Large-scale Management: The Example of Tautog in VirginiaFisheries, 2007
- Allometry of natural mortality as a basis for assessing optimal release size in fish-stocking programmesCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2000
- Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approachReviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 1997
- The relationship between body weight and natural mortality in juvenile and adult fish: a comparison of natural ecosystems and aquacultureJournal of Fish Biology, 1996
- The Analysis of a Catch CurveBiometrics, 1960