Effect of non-linearity of a predictor on the shape and magnitude of its receiver-operating-characteristic curve in predicting a binary outcome
Author:
Open Access
- 31 August 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 7 (1) , 1-7
Abstract
Area under a receiver-operating-characteristic (AUROC) curve is widely used in medicine to summarize the ability of a continuous predictive marker to predict a binary outcome. This study illustrated how a U-shaped or inverted U-shaped continuous predictor would affect the shape and magnitude of its AUROC curve in predicting a binary outcome by comparing the ROC curves of the worst first 24-hour arterial pH values of 9549 consecutive critically ill patients in predicting hospital mortality before and after centering the predictor by its mean or median. A simulation dataset with an inverted U-shaped predictor was used to assess how this would affect the shape and magnitude of the AUROC curve. An asymmetrical U-shaped relationship between pH and hospital mortality, resulting in an inverse-sigmoidal ROC curve, was observed. The AUROC substantially increased after centering the predictor by its mean (0.611 vs 0.722, difference = 0.111, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.087–0.135), and was further improved after centering by its median (0.611 vs 0.745, difference = 0.133, 95%CI 0.110–0.157). A sigmoidal-shaped ROC curve was observed for an inverted U-shaped predictor. In summary, a non-linear predictor can result in a biphasic-shaped ROC curve; and centering the predictor can reduce its bias towards null predictive ability.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using patient admission characteristics alone to predict mortality of critically ill patients: A comparison of 3 prognostic scoresJournal of Critical Care, 2016
- Comparing ROC curves derived from regression modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2012
- Incidence and risk factors for fatal pulmonary embolism after major trauma: a nested cohort studyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2010
- Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve: Practical Review for RadiologistsKorean Journal of Radiology, 2004
- Slopes of a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Likelihood Ratios for a Diagnostic TestAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Some Practical Issues of Experimental Design and Data Analysis in Radiological ROC StudiesInvestigative Radiology, 1989
- The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC CurvesMedical Decision Making, 1988
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology, 1983
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982