Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 145 (12) , 2639-2645
Abstract
Recent reports have asserted that, because of energy underreporting, dietary self-report data suffer from measurement error so great that findings thKeywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of U.S. Nutritional Surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Caloric Energy Intake Data, 1971–2010PLOS ONE, 2013
- Taking Advantage of the Strengths of 2 Different Dietary Assessment Instruments to Improve Intake Estimates for Nutritional EpidemiologyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Measurement error modeling and nutritional epidemiology association analysesCanadian Journal of Statistics, 2011
- Evaluation and Comparison of Food Records, Recalls, and Frequencies for Energy and Protein Assessment by Using Recovery BiomarkersAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Dealing With Dietary Measurement Error in Nutritional Cohort StudiesJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011
- Americans Do Not Meet Federal Dietary RecommendationsThe Journal of Nutrition, 2010
- Statistical Aspects of the Use of Biomarkers in Nutritional Epidemiology ResearchStatistics in Biosciences, 2009
- Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental AnimalsHypertension, 2005
- Periconceptional supplementation with folate and/or multivitamins for preventing neural tube defects2001
- Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitationsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000