Comparative analysis of nanotechnology awareness in consumers and experts in South Korea
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 December 2014
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Nanomedicine
- Vol. 9, 21-7
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined the need for public communication about nanotechnologies and nanoparticles by providing a comparative analysis of the differences in risk awareness of nanotechnologies and nanoparticles between consumers and experts. Methods: A total of 1,007 consumers and 150 experts participated in this study. A questionnaire was prepared examining their awareness of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials and their view of the necessity for information and education about the latest nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. Results: Our results indicated that the expert group recognized that they knew more than consumers about nanotechnology and that there was a need for relevant education in nanotechnology and nanomaterials among consumers. We found that the consumer group had a more positive attitude toward nanotechnology, even though they did not know much about it. Moreover, the consumer group was inconclusive about the type of information on nanotechnology deemed necessary for the public, as well as the suitable party to be responsible for education and for delivering the information. Conclusion: An education and promotion program targeting consumers should be established to overcome the differences between consumers and experts in their awareness of nanotechnology. Specifically, the establishment of concepts for nanomaterials or nanoproducts is required immediately. With clear standards on nanomaterials, consumers can make informed decisions in selecting nanoproducts in the market.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanisms of carbon nanotube-induced toxicity: Focus on pulmonary inflammationAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2013
- Mechanisms of Nanoparticle-Induced Oxidative Stress and ToxicityBioMed Research International, 2013
- Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysisJournal of Nanoparticle Research, 2012
- Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologiesNature Nanotechnology, 2009
- Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United KingdomNature Nanotechnology, 2008
- Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology HazardsRisk Analysis, 2007
- Expert and Public Perception of Risk from BiotechnologyRisk Analysis, 2004
- Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnologyScience and Engineering Ethics, 2000
- The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene TechnologyRisk Analysis, 2000