Effectiveness of synthetic hydroxyapatite versus Persian Gulf coral in an animal model of long bone defect reconstruction
Open Access
- 29 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
- Vol. 14 (4) , 259-268
Abstract
Background There is a continuing search for bone substitutes to avoid or minimize the need for autogenous bone grafts. Hydroxyapatite, a crystalline phase of calcium phosphate found naturally in bone minerals, has shown tremendous promise as a graft material. Coral is an osteoconductive material used as a bone graft extender. This study examined the effect of hydroxyapatite and Persian Gulf coral on osteogenesis in vivo using a rabbit model of bone healing. Materials and methods A critical-size defect of 10 mm elongation was created in the radial diaphysis of 36 rabbits and supplied with either hydroxyapatite or coral or left empty (control group). Radiographs of each forelimb were taken postoperatively on day 1 and then at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks postinjury to evaluate bone formation, union, and remodeling of the defect. The operated radiuses were removed on the 56th postoperative day and were grossly and histopathologically evaluated. In addition, biomechanical testing was conducted on the operated and normal forelimbs of half of the animals of each group. Results In radiological evaluation, bone formation and union were significantly superior in the coral and hydroxyapatite groups in comparison with the control group on the 42nd and 56th day postinjury (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences between groups in remodeling criteria at the 56th day postinjury (P > 0.05). In histopathological evaluation, the union scores of the rabbits administered hydroxyapatite or coral were statistically superior to those of the animals of the control group on the 56th day postinjury (P < 0.05). In biomechanical evaluation, the control group showed weakness of biomechanical properties in comparison with the coral and hydroxyapatite groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions According to this study, significant difference was not observed between hydroxyapatite and natural coral and these two materials were significantly better than the control group at 8 weeks postinjury.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Targeted Gene-and-host Progenitor Cell Therapy for Nonunion Bone Fracture RepairMolecular Therapy, 2011
- Effects of sodium-hyaluronate and glucosamine-chondroitin sulfate on remodeling stage of tenotomized superficial digital flexor tendon in rabbits: a clinical, histopathological, ultrastructural, and biomechanical studyConnective Tissue Research, 2010
- Direct Gene Therapy for Bone Regeneration: Gene Delivery, Animal Models, and Outcome MeasuresTissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 2010
- Biomechanical properties and dry weight content of the developing superficial digital flexor tendon in rabbitComparative Clinical Pathology, 2008
- Response of a Collagenase-Induced Tendon Injury to Treatment with a Polysulphated Glycosaminoglycan (Adequan)Connective Tissue Research, 2008
- Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineeringBiomaterials, 2007
- The Osteogenic Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for the Repair of Rabbit Calvarial DefectsAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2006
- Adipose-derived adult stromal cells heal critical-size mouse calvarial defectsNature Biotechnology, 2004
- Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegrationEuropean Spine Journal, 2001
- Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Proteins: Novel Substances for Enhancing Bone HealingVeterinary Surgery, 1995